Story of the Day: NY Times Buries Dodd's Filibuster Threat Victory

(updated below)

It's nothing new for our country's Paper of Record to stick a crucial story in its back pages (often while providing front-page real estate to a particularly banal article).

But one of the most egregious examples of such editorial decisions is today's move by The New York Times to bury news of presidential candidate Senator Christopher Dodd's victorious filibuster threat against the proposed telecom immunity bill.

So what page did The Times slip in this account of Dodd's courageous and historic stand? What page did it cover this patriotic push-back to a bill that, if passed, would effectively reward telecom companies for complicity in the Bush administration's illegal wiretapping of millions of innocent American citizens and set a frightening precedent of similar retroactive immunity in such cases where various parties (CIA, Blackwater mercenaries, etc.) took part in torture, extraordinary renditions or other criminal activities in George Bush's "war on terror"? What page did the paper that sat on the illegal wiretapping story for a year - before "scooping" it - deem this fit to print?

A29. Yes, A29.

(The online version has no page numbers, but this news is buried there as well; no mention of it even makes the home page - where over 90 stories currently reside.)

Now ask yourself how? Who at The Times authorized this inane editorial decision? And what excuse can possibly explain it away?

Senator Dodd's threat to filibuster yesterday and his triumph in having the patently unconstitutional bill withdrawn from a vote last night is precisely the kind of story that should be big news in a democracy, especially one such as ours, which has been gasping under the boot of an overtly criminal White House for seven long years.

What's the sound of one U.S. senator taking a successful stand against a rogue White House administration and its spineless collaborators in Congress?

If you're The Times, it's something akin to a whisper.

(Editor's Note: If you tried to comment today and received a message about triggering the spam filter - some people got this, some didn't - I apologize for your troubles. Typepad, which hosts this site, has installed a new, overly aggressive spam filter. Rest assured I can now access this filter and publish anyone's comment that incorrectly winds up there. So post comments as you normally would. If you don't see yours right away, you will shortly. Thanks for your patience and for contributing to the conversation.)

UPDATE: Commenter EastFallowfield left this earlier today:

A29 in the Times doesn't mean it's buried. It's not front page, but the first x amount of pages after page 1 are International News.

The National news starts in the middle somewhere, and this time of year there are a ton of fullpage or other large ads filling up many pages of the A section. It was right in the middle of all the pages on politics and such.

The Times is no "Thinkprogress" or Kos, but if it's not on the front page then it was pretty much where it was supposed to be in their world.

I responded to it in the comments section and thought the points made helped to further clarify the irresponsibility of The Times' editorial decision, so I'm reposting my response here, too:

EastFallowField, thanks for your comment. But I think you're giving The Times far too much credit here. First, there's no valid reason why this story didn't make the front page. That said, here's a deeper examination of its specific placement:

When the Times thinks a story is important but is short on space, it sometimes puts a photo of the story on the cover that calls out the page number inside (as it did for the large Darfur peace rally in Central Park a year and a half ago).

Or the Times will highlight a story on the front page's "Inside" section. What were some of the stories on the "Inside" section that beat out the Dodd news yesterday? #2: "NBC Late Shows to Resume"; #4: "Why the Long Face?" (about a new book that helps you diagnose what's ailing your pet dog, cat, ferret, etc.); #7: "A Winning Influence" (a successful all-Indian high school basketball team in Oklahoma).

In addition to the "Inside" section (located on the cover), there is also the "News Summary" area located on the following page (A2). This section also serves to highlight important articles inside the paper, from International, National, New York/Region, Business, Science, Health & Fitness, and Editorial. This section calls out five National stories. The Dodd news wasn't there either. What's one of the stories that was? #3: "Churches Battle Witchcraft." I wish I were making that up. Unfortunately, this was yet another story The Times deemed more critical than Dodd's victory.

Finally, the first page of the National section on that day was A24; the Dodd news, as mentioned, was located on A29. That's six pages into the National news section. While it should've been on the cover, that it didn't make the first page of the National section and didn't appear until six pages deep into it, only further underscores the absurdity of The Times' editorial decision and confirms the story was indeed buried.

Moreover, please note two of the three National stories trumping Dodd's victory on the first page of the section - the aforementioned witchcraft article: "A Midnight Service Helps African Immigrants Combat Demons" and this more pressing national news item: "San Francisco's Mayor Proposes Fee on Sales of Sugary Soft Drinks."

Comments

[Brad Jacobson]

NY Times Buries Dodd's Filibuster Threat Victory

[Aris]

What's ironic is that the top NYT editorial today is in support of Dodd's efforts. This must be a new definition of schizophrenia.

[Diane]

The Washington Post also had almost no coverage of the issue. Although they had an article on page A2 after the fact, there was nothing giving any of its readers notice that the issue was up for debate, or that Dodd was mounting the filibuster - nothing to give citizens the ability to support Dodd in his efforts. Moreover, comments I sent to the Post's political chat sessions on Monday and Tuesday were ignored in favor of the usual horserace questions and discussion.

[Elvis Elvisberg]

Their editorial judgment is grounded in a deep, rigid, ideological commitment to centrism.

To them, because Harry Reid supported this bill, it was a peculiar and extreme move by Dodd, leading to a temporary setback.

The substance of the issue is immaterial.

[Ben Stein the Hack]

Well, it was a big news day. Britney's little sister got pregnant, and Hillary is trying to become more well liked!

[Rich2506]

Philadelphia Inquirer had nothing. $70 billion for the war made page A10, Front page is all local stories except for McCain and yeah, Britney's sister is the first picture on the bottom four pix of the day in the online version.

[Michael Markman]

You'd think that on the basic "man bites dog" scale, a Democrat showing some spine would break on A-1.

[FearItself]

Isn't John Edwards the father of Britney's sister's baby? That justifies putting it on the front page, right?

[cwazycajun]

does ruppert murdock secretly own the new york times??? inquiering minds wanna know

[EastFallowfield]

A29 in the Times doesn't mean it's buried. It's not front page, but the first x amount of pages after page 1 are International News.

The National news starts in the middle somewhere, and this time of year there are a ton of fullpage or other large ads filling up many pages of the A section. It was right in the middle of all the pages on politics and such.

The Times is no "Thinkprogress" or Kos, but if it's not on the front page then it was pretty much where it was supposed to be in their world.

[GR]

Why does anyone find this unusual? It's like trying to make sense of Joe Klein LYING to his readers and TIME going along with it, supporting the deception. This is America's media. They are ALL corporate whores, they do NOT care about this country only theirs and their friends money and power, that is all. Americas future, the constitution is horseshit in these people's eyes.

Remember Howard Dean threatended to reduce media consolidation and what happened to him?

Now what do you think would be happening to Dodd right now if he were actually in a position to win the nomination? hah You would have every outlet attacking him today talking about how he has killed the democratic party and is endangering "the troops'. The only one not hammering Dodd today would be Chris Matthews and that is only because he is still spitting all over himself due to his sick, sick Hillary fetish.

To think this nation can expect ANY part of its media to be honest or do their "job" when it comes to protecting democrcacy is as silly as thinking Bush would tell the truth or "change" or to think conservatism isn't eat up with theocrats, fascists, homophobic and anti-science authoritarians...to think the media cares is to be an naive and complicit as the democrats who still don't understand conservatism is about the subvertion of the constitution, that is ALL they do.

[Lolly]

So, why not move it up to the front page of their online version by e-mailing it to someone? Then it will be on their "most e-mailed" list, despite their attempts to bury it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/18/washington/18nsa.html

[Ulysses]

I second the e-mailing suggestion... it really works!!

[Chris_B]

See! More proof of the liberal media and their nefarious anti-corporate agenda!

[Jim Lund]

It's a scene out of the movie "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington"! Updated slightly--there's no free paper trying to print the news so we are spared the sight of NYT thugs beating kids, and the A29 mention allows the NYT to claim they 'covered' the story.

Those old science fiction stories predict the future remarkably well, but the details are always slightly off. :)

[Eric Juve]

The Oregonian had nothing...

[Brad Jacobson]

EastFallowfield, thanks for your comment. But I think you're giving The Times far too much credit here. First, there's no valid reason why this story didn't make the front page. That said, here's a deeper examination of its specific placement:

When the Times thinks a story is important but is short on space, it sometimes puts a photo of the story on the cover that calls out the page number inside (as it did for the large Darfur peace rally in Central Park a year and a half ago).

Or the Times will highlight a story on the front page's "Inside" section. What were some of the stories on the "Inside" section that beat out the Dodd news yesterday? #2: "NBC Late Shows to Resume"; #4: "Why the Long Face?" (about a new book that helps you diagnose what's ailing your pet dog, cat, ferret, etc.); #7: "A Winning Influence" (a successful all-Indian high school basketball team in Oklahoma).

In addition to the "Inside" section (located on the cover), there is also the "News Summary" area located on the following page (A2). This section also serves to highlight important articles inside the paper, from International, National, New York/Region, Business, Science, Health & Fitness, and Editorial. This section calls out five National stories. The Dodd news wasn't there either. What's one of the stories that was? Number three: "Churches Battle Witchcraft." I wish I were making that up. Unfortunately, this was yet another story The Times deemed more critical than Dodd's victory.

Finally, the first page of the National section on that day was A24; the Dodd news, as mentioned, was located on A29. That's six pages into the National news section. While it should've been on the cover, that it didn't make the first page of the National section and didn't appear until six pages deep into it, only further underscores the absurdity of The Times' editorial decision and confirms the story was indeed buried.

Moreover, please note two of the three National stories trumping Dodd's victory on the first page of the section - the aforementioned witchcraft article: "A Midnight Service Helps African Immigrants Combat Demons" and this more pressing national news item: "San Francisco's Mayor Proposes Fee on Sales of Sugary Soft Drinks."

[cal1942]

"What's ironic is that the top NYT editorial today is in support of Dodd's efforts. This must be a new definition of schizophrenia."

Schizophrenia yes. but News division is separate from Editorial division

[shubhinetwork]

NY Times Buries Dodd's Filibuster Threat Victory is a very nice story and article....
woohoo thats how I like it! The people posting the better!
------
Girish
------
buy forclosed homes--buy forclosed homes

[replica tag heuer]

Looking forward to another great blog. Its an informative topic. Good luck to the author! all the best!

[r4i]

thanks !! very helpful post!Keep working ,great job!

[Louis Vuitton Outlet]

Nike Air Jordan can be a Gucci outlet renowned manufacturer label engrossed in fabricating fashionable Gucci outlet online couple for offspring, older individuals, men, and ladies. Gucci sale.

Nike Air Jordan is frequently popular as Jordan Concords during the small configuration and is also pretty admired Jordan 11 Concord and acknowledged due to products created of chic sports Jordan Retro 11 Concord activities boots who have rake in globally acknowledgement Jordan Retro 10 for being very resilient and cozy. Jordan 10 The label on the money gathering is supported about the label of Jordan 10 Chicago its holder Michael Jordan who was an amateur of latest Louis Vuitton Outlet solution footwear; he employed to get well-known Cheap Louis Vuitton Sale as being a faultless icon in the most recent strategy marketplace.

He commenced up New Orleans Saints Jerseys in 1985, the monetary gathering was commenced with Youth Saints Jersey some staff that everlasting fetched new creations Women's Saints Jersey for the business. But using the means of time Custom Saints Jersey boots received globally credits Custom NFL Jerseys and a great number of paying out clientele Customized NFL Jerseys who ended up most up-to-date tactic savvy Personalized NFL Jerseys population and preferred to put on boots of surplus well worth and content.

Now, using under consideration the Christian Louboutin Sale qualifications the fiscal gathering has, I Christian Louboutin Shoes ought declare that Nike Air Jordan has become toiling while in the wares of flexible Louboutin Shoes specifics which might be getting designed for people getting Louboutin Sale.

Assorted purely natural world about vogue Cheap Jordans and hope to produce a group on their couple of boot properly by Jordan 11 shopping into latest fashion. Nike Air Jordan 's boots are obtainable Jordan Retro 11 in divergent range- they offer a large kind of boots in divergent hues,Jordan XI creations, profile, and of course in divergent selling price. The cost construction of the boots differs from one method of Jordan 11 Concord a further; this really is fully approximately your possibility and likings.

When your allocation Cheap True Religion Jeans sanctions you to depart for remarkably charge boots with the True Religion Jeans then you definately should depart for it, since the finest,True Religion Cheap the standard.Any person who professes True Religion Outlet to love basketball just isn't a real follower of your game if he will not know the exploits of the best athlete who actually performed the game.

Just after all, you can find conceivably no Uggs On Sale basketball admirer who doesn't know the fame and exploits Ugg On Sale of Michael Jordan.

Even individuals that have been born Uggs following his retirement continue to be attentive to the echoes of the Jordan Uggs Outlet period as manifested from the acceptance of Uggs Boots quantity 23 in basketball jerseys, inside Uggs On Sale the variety of vain tries to emulate gliding from the Cheap Jordans air for a dunk that only His Airness can execute, and of Jordan 7 course, from the enormous recognition of Jordan sneakers hoping Jordan Retro 7 that some regular kid from an not known corner of the world Jordan 13 will someday have the game during the method that Michael Louis Vuitton Jordan did.

Michael Jordan's fame pass on not Louis Vuitton Outlet merely in the basketball courts he performed on, New Nike Air Jordans Shoes from his School days at Cheap Jordans North Carolina as many as his time for the NBA together with the Abercrombie And fitch Outlet and also the Abercrombie And fitch Online Washington Wizards, even at Spain for the 1992 Cheap Abercrombie And fitch Barcelona Olympics.

In each one of these locations and time, nike free run acquired repute for staying a fearless executioner with the most nike frees tricky photographs that has a penchant for taking the sport cheap nike free profitable shot once the game is about the line, and in Cheap NFL Jerseys inspiring his teammates to excel to NFL Jerseys greater heights. This only triggered men and women to Cheap Jerseys flock to watch him play, widening his
Nike Dunks base of supporters. For that reason, what's more, it enlarged the repute of Jordan sneakers, which has Nike Air Maxturn into carefully determined using the gentleman. As Air Max Shoesa result, Air Jordans happen to be worn all over Cheap Supras the place, with most hoping to at the very least Supras Shoes
emulate a number of his remarkable difficult court moves.