« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 03, 2007

The Wounded-Courier:
Democrats Sign Resolution for Presidential “Timeout"

WASHINGTON, DC - In a stepped-up slap on the wrist, Senate Democrats, led by Carl M. Levin (D-Michigan), agreed on Friday to a bipartisan resolution calling for a mandatory timeout for President Bush.

Facing reporters on Capitol Hill, Senator Levin explained, “Some might say this doesn’t go far enough. But just imagine the impact had someone only forced a five-to-ten minute timeout on Attila the Hun, Adolph Hitler or Idi Amin. Even Richard Nixon. If they’d only been given a little breathing room to reconsider their actions, there’s no telling what kind of about-face might have occurred, how many lives might have been spared.”

In between a town hall text-messaging meeting in Cleveland with Pro-Life Home-Schooling Single Carnie Mothers for Jesus (PLHSSCMJ) and en route to a NRA-sponsored club-and-shoot veal roast in Des Moines, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-New York) said she supported the resolution but stressed that more needs to be done.

“Though this sends a clear message I am not on board with this president’s failed Iraq policy while providing me enough wiggle room that it won’t come back to haunt me in 2008, saying it’s not going far enough also sends a signal I’m taking a tougher stand than I really am.” Senator Clinton added, “This president has got to understand that he will not derail my presidential run. I promised the American people that I was in this to win it. No matter how many U.S. troops and Iraqis die, I pledge to work harder than anyone in Congress to make sure my campaign is positioned for victory.”

Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin), the lone Democratic voice in the Senate to oppose this resolution, appeared on the radio program Democracy Now! on Friday. Speaking with host and alleged terrorist sympathizer Amy Goodman, Feingold said, “Everyone knows you don’t bring a knife to gunfight. Well, you also don’t replace that knife with a big foam finger.” Feingold further argued, “Far from emboldening the enemy, this resolution makes the Vichy government look like it had a set of brass ones.”

But some critics of this resolution see it quite differently than Senator Feingold.

Conservative blogger Michelle Malkin wrote, “It has come to pass in America that sedition is now a form of patriotism. In any other country in the world, these members of Congress who sign this bill, Democrat or Republican, would be blindfolded, lined up against a wall and shot. Their families would lie awake in terror wondering if they’re next. And the citizens, relieved their republic had been defended from homegrown insurgents, would rightly rejoice in the streets. For those of you who don’t know, that’s called justice. Something we don’t see much of in America today. Instead, we are witnessing the insidious impact of unchecked liberalism - what happens, as the Prince song says, ‘When Doves Cry.’”

Appearing on Today, columnist Ann Coulter told host Matt Lauer that “death is the easy way out for those who sign this resolution.” She went on to explain, “I’ve given it a lot of thought, Matt. You know, should we behead them? Burn them at the stake? A good stoning, maybe? Death by a thousand cuts, literally? Have crows pluck out their eyes and peck away at their desiccated sun-stroked bodies while illegal aliens are forced to slather them with clover honey and pour buckets of fire ants over their heads? Hahaha! But, Matt, death really is too lenient for these treasonous liberal cretins. These flag-burning Constitutional trollops. Permanent extraordinary rendition is the only thing that makes sense to me.”

“Do you think maybe that’s going a little too far?" asked Lauer. "That you wouldn’t reconsider your stand that death alone wouldn’t suffice as punishment for these crimes?” Coulter, enraged by the question, let out a piercing shriek, raked a claw across Lauer’s cheek, spread her wings and took flight from the studio, injuring 10 other Today staff members, three seriously, before crashing through a window and mauling a Swedish family sitting atop a passing New York Apple tour bus.

February 01, 2007

Story of the Day:
NBC Nightly News Has Us Seeing Double

Notice anything odd about this list of NBC Nightly News top stories (located on MSNBC's website)?

Reality check: Is Iran aiding terrorists?  
Fleecing of America: Parsons in Iraq
• British men arrested in U.K. terror plot
• A not-so-funny terror scare in Boston
• Reality check: Is Iran aiding terrorists?
• Miami employs Israeli security tactic at its airport
• Do you suffer from restless leg syndrome?

No, it's not that they're doing a story on
restless leg syndrome (which, by the way, was the puffiest of puff pieces for a questionable drug treatment and the pharmaceutical company that promoted it: it's not surprising that the company in question, GlaxoSmithKline, is also, as Brian Williams mentioned at the top of the report, a regular sponsor of the broadcast).

Of course, what's truly peculiar is the repetition of the headline "Reality check: Is Iran aiding terrorists?"


First, to be fair, the
report by Andrea Mitchell calls into question these Bush administration allegations. Her segment reveals that, thus far, these White House claims are unverifiable.

But to the main issue at hand: With George W. Bush beating his chickenhawk chest every day over Iran, this headline would be provocative enough if it were listed once. Many people who give it just a glance without clicking through will almost certainly think that the story would, in fact, affirm that Iran is aiding the terrorists in Iraq.

And why shouldn't they? It's what the mainstream media has been reporting, unfiltered, straight from the horse's mouth who told us there were WMD in Iraq.

So, even in that sense, NBC News giveth and NBC News taketh away, probably misinforming about as many people who glance at this headline as they are informing the viewers who happen to click through and watch the segment.

But the double headline is indefensibly sloppy (and some might argue not so unintentional): the equivalent of viral marketing of misinformation if the reader does notice it and subliminal marketing if the reader doesn't consciously make note of the mistake yet (combined with the onslaught on the White House's anti-Iran media campaign) comes away with an uneasy feeling that, yes, maybe Iran has finally gone too far.

This faux pas almost makes me long for the simpler days of "Obama bin Laden" headlines.

Editor's Note: I just wanted to express my heavy heart over the passing of columnist Molly Ivins. I will be posting a tribute to her over the weekend. First comes mourning. Then celebration of a life. In Molly's case, a life well lived.

GET THE HOUND IN YOUR INBOX

  • Don't miss the latest media critique, scoop or satire. (On average, 2-4 posts a week.)

    Enter Your Email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Help Support Truth in Media

  • This is a one-man operation. Your donations, which support timely research and investigations, directly help to keep the media honest. Thanks for whatever you can give.

Search



Read Satire (Trans Fat 0g)

Google Ads

Never Again...Again

Legal

  • All Original Material
    © 2008 MediaBloodhound