« August 2006 | Main | October 2006 »

September 30, 2006

From the Archives:
Slaughterhouse Live

(This Story of the Day was originally posted on August 16, 2006. Since that time, 109 more of our troops have been killed in Iraq; the U.S. death toll reached 2,711 today. Sectarian violence continues unabated. And more suicide attacks occurred this week than at any other time during the war. Concurrently, television coverage, as well as the prominence and frequency of stories in national newspapers, has waned, mirroring the same pattern that took place as the 2004 presidential election drew near. It's back to all terror, all the time. Meanwhile, the slaughterhouse rages on. Our troops have been abandoned by leaders who view death as a means to an end, even if that end isn't feasible.)

It's time to all join hands and say it together: Iraq is in the midst of a civil war. It's not "in danger" of one, not "slipping into" or "sliding toward" one. It's not even gazing longingly at one. It has arrived. And the mainstream media must end its parsing of words.

Bush's unnecessary war has blown up in his face and, according to July's death toll, is now killing more than 110 Iraqi civilians a day. This carnage marks a 9% increase over June's tally, doubling the toll of January. The Chicago Tribune reports:

The rising numbers indicate that sectarian violence is spiraling out of control, and seemed to bolster an assertion many senior Iraqi officials and American military analysts have been making in recent months: The country is already embroiled in a civil war, not just slipping into one, and the American-led forces are caught between Sunni Arab guerrillas and Shiite militias.

It's official. Our troops, sent to fight under false pretenses by this extremist White House, are now slogging through a human abattoir. There is no end in sight. And no reason to believe another dead or disfigured or mentally shattered American soldier will serve any purpose but to broaden the scope of this senseless tragedy.

When the tally for civilian deaths in July is added to the Iraqi government numbers for earlier months obtained by the United Nations, the total indicates that at least 17,776 Iraqi civilians died violently in the first seven months of this year, or an average of 2,539 per month.

The death toll for U.S. troops now stands at 2,602; 19,511 of our young men and women have been wounded. Make no mistake about it: Iraq is their Vietnam. Another blind death march. Our soldiers aren't making a sacrifice; they are being sacrificed. Left adrift by an administration undeterred by facts on the ground, military advisors, political forebears, historians or even their own conscience.

A recent Washington Post report revealed the growing frustration among our troops. Spec. Tim Ivey, 28, of San Antonio, said, “It sucks. Honestly, it just feels like we're driving around waiting to get blown up. That's the most honest answer I could give you.” Summing up the seeming senselessness of their mission, Spec. David Fulcher, 22, a medic from Lynchburg, Va., said, "At this point, it seems like the war on drugs in America. It's like this never-ending battle, like, we find one IED, if we do find it before it hits us, so what? You know it's just like if the cops make a big bust, next week the next higher-up puts more back out there."

Nevertheless, the slaughterhouse continues to churn.

Iraqi Deaths Hit Record in July
Chicago Tribune

September 29, 2006

The Wounded-Courier:
Bush Pushes Bill to Abolish Democratic Party

Washington, DC – Fresh off his legislative triumph on detainee treatment, President Bush proposed a new bill today to make the Republican Party the sole political party in the country. Going forward, Bush said, the GOP would simply be known as the “American Party.” Addressing the press in the Rose Garden, the president urged Congress to pass the legislation as swiftly as possible, arguing “the war on terror is best fought with a united front” and that “terrorists are not hamstrung by an opposition party telling them they can’t do this or that, slowing ’em down, so neither should we.”

In an effort to assuage critics who might see the bill as too dramatic and ill timed in an election year, Mr. Bush attempted to lessen concerns by making clear that, if passed, the law would be phased in gradually, not taking full effect until January 1, 2007. In the interim, Democrats, both those currently in Congress and any who manage to pick up new seats in November, will act in a clearly “advisory-only capacity” to members of the Republican Party until their roles as representatives of their constituents are completely null and voided come the new year. At such time, the Republican Party will then officially change its title to the American Party.

“It’s a new dawn in America,” Bush said. “One heart. One mind. Bound together in pursuit to triumph over evil and maintain our way of life.” The president added, “If the Democrats attempt to stand in the way of this legislation, it will only prove their refusal to face this deadly terrorist threat head-on. Americans cannot afford such cowardice. The constant second-guessing must end if we are to win this war. The two-party system, like the Geneva Conventions, are no longer applicable to deal with these blood-thirsty barbarians at the gate.”

The president then fielded a couple of questions from the press. David Gregory of NBC asked, “Sir, if this law were to go into effect, if we are to have only the American Party, as you say, how could we continue to refer to our country as a democracy?” The president, somewhat irritated by Gregory’s question, replied, “You know, I refer to our country as America. Uh, all these tags – Republican, Democrat, democracy, fascism…uh, all those isms, you know, I don’t worry about that. I’m only concerned about protecting the American people, David.” Gregory followed up by saying, “I’m not really sure if you’ve answered the question, Mr. President. So, for the record, you’re saying we no longer live in a democracy.” Bush shot back, “You know, you can ask that question all you want, David, but I gave you my answer.” Gregory muttered something inaudible, though it prompted Bush to go on the offensive, wagging his finger at Gregory and promising, “I will take you out.”

Appearing somewhat wary of following this exchange, Terry Moran of ABC inquired if the White House had uncovered any new information on missing veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas (rumored to have last been seen conversing with Vice President Dick Cheney). “Ms. Thomas,” Bush said, and then sighed, “she is, uh, as far as I know, she has retired.” Moran replied, “Sir, it just seems a little odd that her own newspaper had not been notified by Helen about her retirement. Also, Dana Priest of the Washington Post had reported seeing Mr. Cheney pulling Ms. Thomas somewhat forcibly into the White House this past Tuesday.” Bush shook his head, saying, “As I said, Terry, Helen has retired. And, uh, I think how she decides to spend that retirement should be up to Helen. She has earned it.”

It’s unclear whether Democrats will risk a filibuster during the heated election season, even though such a law would mean a permanent end to their party and their life in public service. When pressed on this question, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) revealed only, “Of course, much is at stake here,” adding, “I can only say that we do stand united both against the terrorists and against the president’s preposterous new proposed legislation.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-California) promised, "The Democratic Party will not be swayed by the president's dime store reverse psychology. We will do what we can to stop this bill, just short of accomplishing anything. And I think it will be quite clear to the American people that we, as Democrats, are willing to risk our very extinction so that we may defeat the terrorists."

John McCain (R-Arizona), the maverick senator who first opposed Bush’s interrogation bill before coming back into the fold to support the president, expressed some reservations about the new one-party idea. “I haven’t seen the legislation yet, so I’m going to reserve my judgment until then. But I do think our president deserves the benefit of the doubt during wartime. I look forward to addressing any concerns I may have about his new bill, before giving in to his demands.”

Later in the afternoon, President Bush addressed NEWB (Nazis Enthralled With Bush), a splinter group of REWN (Republicans Enthralled With Nazis), at a low-profile White House fundraiser. Opening the event, NEWB members presented Mr. Bush with a stress ball in the shape of a swastika, to which the appreciative president replied, “Thank you, and I welcome you all with a heartfelt, 'Sieg heil!'”

September 28, 2006

Story of the Day:
Networks Undercut Dems and Facts in Torture Debate

In addition to referring to George W. Bush's "alternative interrogation techniques" without mentioning what they entail (i.e. various forms of torture), as did NBC Nightly News tonight, the network newscasts failed to show any substantive clips of Democrats who opposed Bush's bill. Moreover, most conspicuously absent were clips that provided more insight into this issue than their respective newscasts have previously allowed. An interesting tactic. One that keeps their viewers in the dark as to their prior surface reporting on the subject. Which, of course, only compounds their ineptitude of coverage.

For instance, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) outlined not only why this bill is unconstitutional and un-American, he also adroitly highlighted the fact that this legislation, like this administration's previous procedures for detainees, will only make it more difficult to try and prosecute detainees who might actually be guilty of a crime. Moreover, he underscored the fact that this legislation puts innocent American citizens in danger of being disappeared as well.

And though I strongly believe Senator Reid and his fellow Democrats should have filibustered today, on principle alone, the miniscule soundbites afforded them by the networks tonight was simply shameful. Especially when one considers the amount of time allotted to absolute nonsense in which each of these newscasts engage in nightly.

But, hey, it's only our democracy we're talking about. And the lives of those poor souls who happen to be innocent and already have been, or will be, swallowed up by this "legal" black hole.

Here's a portion of Senator Reid's speech (a full transcript follows):

For five years, Democrats stood ready to work with the President and the Republican Congress to establish sound procedures for military tribunals. Senator Patrick Leahy, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill in 2002 to do just that.

Unfortunately, President Bush chose to ignore the Congress and ignore the advice of uniformed military professionals. He set up a flawed and imbalanced military tribunal system that failed to prosecute a single terrorist. Not surprisingly, it was ruled unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court.

Forced by the Court decision to ask Congress for help, the Bush administration initially asked us to rubberstamp basically the same system that the Supreme Court struck down. Their proposal for one-sided trials and murky interrogation rules was opposed by such well-respected leaders as General Colin Powell and former Secretary of State George Schultz.

...

The bill before us diverges from the Committee bill in at least two important respects.

First, it makes less clear that the United States will abide by our obligations under the Geneva Conventions. The President says the United States does not engage in torture, and there should be no ambiguity on that point. But this bill gives the president authority to reinterpret our obligations, and limits judicial oversight of that process, putting our own troops at risk on the battlefield.

As Colin Powell has written:

“The world is beginning to doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism. To redefine Common Article 3 would add to those doubts. Furthermore, it would put our own troops at risk.”

Second, this bill authorizes a vast expansion of the President’s power to detain people – even U.S. citizens – indefinitely and without charge. No procedures for doing so are specified, no due process is provided, and no time limit on the detention is set.

At the same time, the bill would generally deprive federal judges of the power to review the legality of many such detentions. This is true even in the case of a lawful permanent resident arrested and held in the United States, and even if that person happens to be completely innocent.

The Framers of our Constitution understood the need for checks and balances, but this bill discards them.

September 27, 2006

Op-Ed Column:
Olbermann Schools Media on Bush's 9/11 Record

Turning to the ongoing argument over whether the present or prior administration was more culpable for 9/11, Keith Olbermann did something novel for TV news on Wednesday night: investigative journalism. And he did it well. In fact, Olbermann did something none of his peers in the mainstream media have managed to do in the more than two years since the 9/11 Commission released its report. He gathered precisely what we do know about the Bush administration's performance leading up to that cloudless day in September - much of which has lain dormant in the commission's report, treated by the mainstream media like a museum piece rather than a usable historical record - and compared these facts and the words and actions of White House officials to their myriad assertions they did everything they could to protect us from that attack.

The result is devastating. Here's a synopsis of the Bush administration's actions before 9/11:

  • Ignored warnings and a detailed game plan from the outgoing Clinton administration entitled "Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from al Qaeda," which included "diplomatic, economic, military, public diplomacy and intelligence tools."
  • Potentially passed on a chance to have Bin Laden handed over to them in February 2001.
  • Downgraded counterterrorism from a cabinet-level job, wherein the only meetings counterterrorism advisor Richard Clarke could get were with deputy secretaries, which led to sweeping inaction and short-sightedness that delayed the first high-level meeting on al Qaeda until September 4, 2001.
  • After it was confirmed Bin Laden was behind the bombing of the USS Cole, Bush "ordered no military strike, no escalation of existing Clinton measures" and "until September 11th, even when Mr. Bush was asked about the Cole, an attack carried out on water by men in a boat, he offered a consistent prescription for keeping America safe, one he reiterated upon taking office: 'To protect our own people, our allies and friends, we must develop and we must deploy effective missile defenses.'"
  • Denied a request from the executive director of the Hart-Rudman Commission to brief Bush and Cheney on the terror threats they had uncovered.
  • On February 26, 2001, former National Commissioner on Terrorism, Chairman Paul Bremer, said the Bush administration will "stagger along until there's a major incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this?" Obviously, this statement did not compel the administration to change course.
  • Failed to heed the warning in February 2001 that, as stated in the 9/11 Commission, "Bin Laden wanted the United States to attack [after the Cole bombing], and if it did not he would launch something bigger."
  • In April 2001, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz declares that administration counterterrorism efforts should be focused on Iraq instead of al Qaeda.
  • Sat on the now infamous presidential daily briefing of August 6, 2001, which reported "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York." According to the 9/11 Commission, "[Bush] did not recall discussing the Aug. 6th report with the Attorney General or whether Rice had done so....We have found no indication of any further discussion before 9/11 among the President and his top advisors of the possibility of a threat of an al Qaeda attack in the United States....Tenet does not recall any discussion with the President of the domestic threat during this period....Domestic agencies did not know what to do, and no one gave them direction. The borders were not hardened. Transportation systems were not fortified. Electronic surveillance was not targeted against a domestic threat. State and local law enforcement were not marshaled to augment the FBI's efforts. The public was not warned."
  • After the events of 9/11, Rice, Cheney and Bush all claimed they couldn't possibly have anticipated terrorists flying planes into buildings. Yet this was on the intelligence community's radar as far back as 1994, with numerous incidents and findings to warrant such a concern.
  • On September 10, 2001, Senator Diane Feinstein requested a meeting with Dick Cheney to "press the case for aggressive counterterrorism measures." She is told that Cheney will need six months to prepare for the meeting.
  • Also on September 10th, "the NSA intercepted a communiqué from Afghanistan to Saudi Arabia, stating 'Tomorrow is zero hour.' That communiqué was only translated into English on September 12th."

Keep in mind that Olbermann's report did not take into account the Bush administration's woeful record on counterterrorism following 9/11, or even its actions since the 9/11 Commission released its report on July 22, 2004. Nearly a year and a half after that report, the 9/11 Commission issued a report card grading the administration's progress in the interim. It received five F's, 12 D's and two "incompletes." This administration and its Republican counterparts in Congress should not only be held to task for falsely presenting themselves as tough on "terror," but they should be pilloried for suggesting their opponents have a weaker track record, whether referring to former President Clinton or members of the Democratic Party presently in Congress or those currently seeking positions in the House or Senate in November.

It was not difficult for Olbermann to pull these facts together. With all due respect to his fine report, professional presentation and polish aside, a high school student with equal access to footage and editing capabilities could have pieced these facts together as well. So why is it that the New York Times or Washington Post, CNN or MSNBC (save Olbermann), or any of the big three network newscasts have failed to present us with one such simple report to dispel the obfuscations and lies and underscore the abject incompetence that is the undeniable fabric of this administration's 9/11 record? Why is it that former President Clinton's concrete assertions about his actions and those of this White House have been chalked up to little more than partisan squabbling during an election season?

Imagine if these leading national news outlets had presented such comprehensive yet succinct reports prior to the 2004 presidential election, when this White House, with the mainstream media cheering along the way, trumpeted its utterly bogus supremacy on protecting the American people from terrorism. Imagine if members of this administration and fellow partisans in Congress were presented with these facts every time they attempted to assert their alternative reality. Some in the mainstream media might, laughably, argue that Olbermann's report was biased. But when facts are claimed to be the subjective tools of journalists, then Orwellian logic rules the day. What is biased, what is subjective, and what is irresponsible is failing to present the American public with just that: facts. Ones uncluttered by partisan spin. To sift through the talking points and disinformation and, yes, lies, and arrive at something as close to the truth as what the record tells us. To avoid falling into the trap of, or willfully partaking in, this administration's version of reality, which has proven at nearly every turn to fall in direct opposition to the facts.

I can only hope that Mr. Olbermann (should he remain on the air) is able to inspire, or even shame, many of his peers into acting more like journalists rather than the carnival barkers and court stenographers they seem more than eager to emulate.

Olbermann begins his special report by saying, "In a sense, we are all still detainees in the wake of 9/11." An apt metaphor, indeed. To this day, we are still denied our basic right, as citizens of a democracy, to a press that acts as our informant, our equalizer. One that tells us exactly what this administration has done and actions it continues to take in our name. And not only after the fact, when crimes have already been committed or misleading anti-democratic legislation has already been passed. Yet, with cover from the mainstream media, this White House has refused to acknowledge its failures, hold its members accountable and is now attempting to pass the buck for its abominable counterterrorism record to the prior administration. All the while maintaining its despotic course to certify America as a rogue nation in the eyes of the world.

Finally, Olbermann's report clocked in at ten minutes. To put that in context, within the first ten minutes of NBC Nightly News on the same night, anchor Brian Williams presented a report on trans-fats. And though trans-fats are certainly unhealthy, isn't the steady diet of lies we are fed by this White House as it starves us daily of our democracy more newsworthy?

September 26, 2006

Story of the Day:
MSM Ignores Officials' Rebuke of Bush's Tortured Logic

The mainstream media continued its personality-driven, facts-be-damned focus on whether the present or prior White House administration was more culpable for 9/11. Simultaneously, it sloppily handled a leaked (and then declassified) portion of the National Intelligence Estimate that concluded the Iraq War "is shaping a new generation of terror leaders." Meanwhile, a stunning letter from former U.S. government and military officials, who jointly expressed the view that torture is ineffective and inhumane, went unnoticed.

Former officials of the CIA, Army, Air Force, State Department and FBI sent this letter to the Judiciary Committee to the attention of Senators Arlen Specter and Patrick Leahy. As our Torturer-in-Chief now scrambles to pass his Stalinist legislation as inconspicuously as possible, the mainstream media taking a pass on this story is quite the gift.

Brief and brilliantly executed by men and women who not only speak from experience but also still believe America must follow the rule of law, here is the letter in its entirety:

Dear Senators:

We write as experienced intelligence and military officers who have served in the frontlines in waging war against communism and Islamic extremism. We fully support the need for proactive operations to identify and disrupt those individuals and organizations who wish to harm our country or its people. We also recognize that intelligence operations, unlike law enforcement initiatives, enjoy more flexibility and less scrutiny, but at the same time must continue to be guided by applicable US law.

We are very concerned that the proposals now before the Congress, concerning how to handle detainees suspected of terrorist activities, run the risk of squandering the greatest resource our country enjoys in fighting the dictators and extremists who want to destroy us—our commitment as a nation to the rule of law and the protection of divinely granted human rights.

Apart from the moral considerations, we believe it is important that the Congress send a clear message that torture is not an effective or useful tactic. As noted recently by the head of Army Intelligence, Lt. Gen. John Kimmons:

No good intelligence is going to come from abusive practices. I think history tells us that. I think the empirical evidence of the last five years, hard years, tells us that.

Our nation was created in response to the abuses visited on our ancestors by the King of England, who claimed the right to enter their homes, to levy taxes at whim, and to jail those perceived as a threat without allowing them to be confronted by their accusers. Now, 230 years later, we find our own President claiming the right to put people in detention centers without legal recourse and to employ interrogation methods that, by any reasonable legal standard, are categorized as torture.

We ask that the Senate lead the way in upholding the principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence and affirmed in the Geneva Conventions regarding the rights of individuals and the obligations of governing authorities towards those in their power. We believe it is important to combat the hatred and vitriol espoused by Islamic extremists, but not at the expense of being viewed as a nation who justifies or excuses torture and incarceration without recourse to a judicial procedure.

The US has been in the forefront of the human rights campaign throughout the 20th century, led by Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. The end of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust inspired the United States to take the lead in making the case that human rights were universal, not parochial. Until recently the policy of our country was that all people, not just citizens of the United States, were entitled to these protections. It is important that the world understand that we remain committed to these principles. In fighting our enemies we must wage this battle in harmony with the traditional values of our society that were enshrined in the opening clause of the Declaration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident...."

Respectfully yours,

CIA Officers:
Milton Bearden, Directorate of Operations
Ray Close, Directorate of Operations
Vincent Cannistraro, Directorate of Operations
Philip Giraldi, Directorate of Operations
James Marcinkowski, Directorate of Operations
Melissa Mahle, Directorate of Operations
Paul Pillar, Directorate of Intelligence
David MacMichael, Directorate of Intelligence
Melvin Goodman, Directorate of Intelligence
Ray McGovern, Directorate of Intelligence
Mary O. McCarthy, DCI professional staff

US Military and Department of Defense:
W. Patrick Lang, (Colonel, US Army retired, Director Defense Humint Services, retired)
A. D. Ackels, (Colonel, US Army, retired)
Karen Kwiatkowski, (Lt. Colonel, USAF, retired)

US Department of State:
Thomas R. Maertens, Deputy Coordinator, Office of Counter Terrorism, US Department of State
Larry C Johnson, Office of Counter Terrorism, US Department of State

Federal Bureau of Investigation:
Christopher Whitcomb, Hostage Rescue Team   

Letter From Intelligence and Military Professionals on Use of Torture
Truthout

September 25, 2006

Story of the Day:
Governor Perry's Bid to Make Texas the No-Star State

That we must act now to avoid the most catastrophic effects of global warming is the consensus among leading climatologists. So what do you do if you're Governor Rick Perry of Texas (successor to enviro-obstructionist George W. Bush) and, in Houston, you already share the dishonor of most smog-filled city with Los Angeles?

Now, Texas utility companies are proposing to build 17 new coal-burning power plants and one petroleum-coke power plant over the next four years.

...

Gov. Rick Perry has issued an executive order fast-tracking state permits for the proposed plants.

How does this gray-thumbed governor justify these plans?

Perry dismissed the opposition's concerns over air quality, arguing they wanted to return Texas to the era of the horse and buggy. Perry emphasized that the utility companies would reduce some pollutants by 20 percent or more.

It's the same kind of thinking that has guided our White House's feckless response to air pollution in general and global warming in particular. The game plan? Champion cosmetic concessions (see Clean Air Act) that, in the end, do little or nothing to curb pollution and often increase global warming dramatically.

The new coal plants will pollute the air with nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide and mercury. But they will be much cleaner than existing plants. Yet, the old plants will continue running full bore; there are no plans to shut them down or replace them.

One emission the federal government does not regulate is carbon dioxide, the primary global-warming gas. The new power plants in Texas will emit the equivalent of 19 million automobiles' worth of carbon dioxide every year. When all the new plants are up and running, Texas will send nearly as much carbon dioxide up its stacks as California, New York and Florida combined.

The bottom line: Protect your coffers in big oil and reap the dividends. Seems like Rick (known to many around Texas as "George II") learned much from his high-pollutin' predecessor, as well as from Dick Cheney, who, ever so democratically, architected this country's environmental laws in closed-door sessions with big oil.

"The relationship between the utility companies and Rick Perry has been a cozy one," says Craig McDonald, director of Texans for Public Justice, a political watchdog group which tracks Texas campaign contributions. "Texas has a pay-to-play government. It's not pretty, but that's the way it works down here."

McDonald says Perry has received $148,000 alone from Earle Nye, retired chairman of TXU.

"Nye gave the governor $2,000 on the day Perry signed the order to expedite TXU's coal-fired plants," McDonald says. "Last year, [TXU] employed 52 paid lobbyists to the tune of $3 million."

Meanwhile, never mind what regular folks in Texas think about Perry's plans. Their lives and their children's lives, just as all of our lives, are cheap in the eyes of politicians like Perry and his White House role models.

"I think he's been bought off," says rancher Ruth Pilant. "TXU has given him money to fast-track these permits and give him enough money and he'll do most anything apparently."

Pilant's land is located inside what she calls "the ring of fire," surrounded by what will eventually be six major coal-burning power plants.

"Why don't these people see what they're doing to the state of Texas?" she asks. "Do we want to be known for the most coal-fired plants in the United States? That doesn't sound good to me. I want to see the stars in the sky, you know, that's what we're out here for, that's the reason we're in Texas."

If Perry is successful, the Lone Star State may become known as such for more than the single star on its flag.

Critics Blasts Texas Plans for New "Dirty" Coal Plants
By Wade Goodwyn
National Public Radio

September 24, 2006

Story of the Day:
Stephanie McMillan Illustrates the Searing Truth

Busy writing about Bush's exploitation of 9/11 and the mainstream media's stenographic flair in covering it, I made a mental note then to come back to the following story, which received little attention in the mainstream media:

Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before being used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.

The object is basically public relations. Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety considerations, said Secretary Michael Wynne. "If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.

"(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press.

The madness of testing flesh-burning weaponry - or any weaponry! - on its own civilians, such as those who dare exercise their free speech in a protest, reeks of a fascist police state. Evidence of which lay in the Bush administration not even batting an eye at Secretary of the Air Force Michael Wynne's suggestion. But what should we expect from a government already bent on secret prisons, torture and ignoring international law?

Political cartoonist Stephanie McMillan nails this twisted logic. It's Sunday; burn with laughter.

Burning Sensation, by Stephanie McMillan
Minimum Security

September 21, 2006

The MediaBloodhound Interview:
Dr. Ben Marble of "Go F**k Yourself, Mr. Cheney" Fame

Ben Marble, the man who gained national attention last year when he told Dick Cheney to go f**k himself in the middle of his televised post-Katrina photo-op in Gulfport, Miss., is a big, gregarious Southerner with the kind of boyish charm and rebellious glint in his eye reminiscent of Randall P. McMurphy from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. An average guy thrust into a crazy, unjust circumstance, who felt compelled to raise his voice and say enough is enough. Marble spoke for millions of Americans when he implored our Vice President to conjugate with himself. Yet, though he filled the role of Everyman that day, he, like McMurphy, is no ordinary man. His message to Dick Cheney was no mere stunt, a goof to capture on video for fifteen minutes of fame. Rather, it was a pointed comment on the hypocrisy and tragic disregard that has guided this White House, and a jumping off point to raise more awareness of the ongoing plight of post-Katrina victims in the Gulf Coast, to which Marble has dedicated himself ever since. ER physician, front man of the rock band dR. O, proprietor of over a dozen websites, self-described computer geek, artist, husband and father, Ben Marble still manages to find time to speak out against injustice and hypocrisy, whether someone is listening or not.

I sat down with Ben on the eve of the fifth anniversary of September 11th, after he happened to run across a couple of op-eds I’d written on Katrina and contacted me out of the blue. Over lunch, we spoke for more than two hours. When the interview came to a close, we hopped in a cab downtown to protest George W. Bush’s visit to Ground Zero. There we stood together with other fellow citizens disgusted by Bush’s relentless exploitation of 9/11. All in all, it was quite a day. The following is the edited transcript of our discussion.

MediaBloodhound: To set the scene for people who don’t know, what led to your now famous encounter with our cuddly Vice President?

Dr. Ben Marble: Well, it’s a bit of a story. You know, of course, the hurricane destroyed my whole neighborhood. We had fled, running for our lives. Or driving for our lives in the car. My wife, she was thirty-nine weeks pregnant. She was having contractions every fifteen minutes, twenty minutes. My son was a year and a half at the time. He had a hundred three, hundred four fever. My fifteen-year-old daughter was with us as well. And we’re driving through this torrential rain, trying to get away.

We left Gulfport at three o’clock in the afternoon. The first hotel we could find was in a place called Lake Park, Georgia, which was about an hour and a half northeast of Tallahassee [Florida] – that’s how far we had to drive. We got there at 7 a.m. We checked in, went to bed. That was the day the storm hit, which also happened to be our wedding anniversary. Little bit of irony there. Slept for about two hours. Got a phone call from one of our friends. He was in Ocean Springs, Mississippi, at his grandfather’s house. He thought the house would be safe ’cause it was three stories. The water was up to the second story and almost up to the third and he was afraid they were all going to die. He called me back forty-five minutes later, said the water was finally going down. They were still alive. Their car floated away. Stuff like that.

We backtracked that night. Stayed in Niceville, Florida. Kinda watched the storm on TV. Then the next morning we stocked up on supplies – generators, gas, chainsaws, water, food. I bought a bicycle. All things we thought we would need. Drove back home. Went and saw my parents. They were still alive. My wife’s parents’ house was OK. We went to our house. We saw it was destroyed. Our whole neighborhood was gone. My wife kinda freaked out, of course, but that’s natural. She’s still having contractions.

That night we spent at her mom’s house. The next day we were just trying to do what we could to start the recovery process. It was ninety-five to a hundred degrees outside. No power. No water. No nothing. It was like living in a military zone. There’s helicopters and military planes flying over all day. It was virtual martial law. After dark they could shoot you on sight if they saw you out. I, in fact, dared go to my friend’s house, literally two hundred yards over one night about an hour after dark, and I had two police come up and draw their guns on me and threaten to shoot me. It was pretty crazy.

Late Wednesday afternoon, my wife was feeling really bad, having more contractions. I’m an ER doctor, so I went ahead and checked her and she was four centimeters. So we started off to the hospital. We got stopped probably three times on the way to the first hospital by military, wondering what we were doing out after dark, pointing their guns at us. So we’re like, well, we’re going to this hospital, we gotta go have this baby, so they let us go. We’d go another half mile and somebody else would pull us over.

We finally made it to that hospital. They had no doctor, no baby doctor. They said if the baby was coming out, they could deliver her outside in a tent. But I wanted her at least to get some sort of pain control to help out there. So we said, “OK, no thanks. We appreciate it, but we’re going somewhere else.” We went to another hospital. We got stopped again, like twice more on the way. Same routine. We finally got there. They had just gotten their generators up. Some water going. They had a nurse midwife. They gave my wife one shot of Nubain Phenergan and after about four hours she had the baby, and the baby was healthy luckily.

She’s in the hospital maybe twelve hours, they said, “You gotta go.” So we went home to her mom’s house. We spent several days there. Over the next several days it was just, you know, dealing with various…mainly volunteers. It wasn’t the government that brought help. It was volunteers from all over the country. Just people driving down with truckloads of stuff. “Here, we’re gonna drop this off here. Y’all need this? We’ll bring you food and water, clothes, different things.” The trick was finding out where stuff was at because you didn’t have much communication to do that. But you did what you could.

So I’d been going to our house here and there, trying to salvage stuff. I managed to talk to my friend Jay into helping me try to get some stuff out of the rubble. We had a rental truck. An eighth of a tank of gas. Gas lines at that point were three-to-four hours long. So that day we got to the train tracks, which were literally about 150 feet or so from my house, they wouldn’t let me cross. They’re telling me I gotta go this extra fifteen-minute route when I know I’m low on gas already and had crossed there every day before. They’re like, “You gotta turn around.” Finally, I put it in reverse – luckily Jay had the camera rolling – and just as I did, I see this long convoy of black cars coming through, ten, fifteen, twenty. They just told me no one can pass here, and ten seconds later they’re waving this caravan of cars through. I was infuriated. I flipped off the convoy. But, uh, we took the long way around. We had no other choice. I mean what are you going to do when the guys got machine guns, you know?

We made it to the house eventually. There are police out front, talking to this woman. That’s another story – this insane woman squatted in our house and started looting the neighborhood, putting it in our house. So I asked the police officer, “What’s going on there?” [Referring to the convoy.] And he said, “Well, the vice president’s down there.” And I said, “Really? Well, you think they’d let us go down there?” He said, “Yeah, they’d really like to talk to some of the locals – that’s why they’re here.” I said, “Oh, OK, great.” So we took off. Jay had the camcorder and I had the camera, and we walked down there. And the whole time we were walking, I thought, you know, I would really like to tell Cheney to go f**k himself. He said that on the senate floor to Senator Leahy, so if I get a chance I’m gonna say it. I told Jay. He said, “Ah, you’re asking for trouble.”

MB: So it was premeditated?

Marble: Yes, it was premeditated. It was very much premeditated. I was kind of like the ultimate Punk’d!

MB: Related to it being premeditated, it did have a polished comedic quality to it. Even your choice to use “Mr.” when you addressed him. I think that’s why your comment seemed to be coming from a sane man who’d simply had enough. Also, had those same words come from a screaming person who’d been dragged away, I think it would’ve been a one-day story for the mainstream media. Maybe not even a full day. I think that’s why it had so much impact. That it was measured, and there was a comical quality to it.

Marble: Well, the premeditated part was the “go f**k yourself.” The “Mr. Cheney,” that just, I don’t know why, I can’t say that was premeditated. I guess I’m used to addressing people respectfully. A lot of people told me that, though. So when we got down there they patted us down, check our I.D.’s. And Jay’s got the camera rolling. And there was such a mob of people covering it that I lost track of Jay. I didn’t know where he was. And Dick was going on and on, doing his little political spin routine. I was thinking to myself, “I better hurry up and say something because he may stop talking any second.” I knew when he did, it was going to be over. I started getting kind of nervous. I was like, I just need to go ahead and say it. I knew I was speaking for a lot of people because my sister-in-law was the first person who got power back who had a television and I’d gone to her house and we saw everything that was happening in the New Orleans area, with, you know, people having nothing to drink, nothing to eat and just being left in the streets to die, to fend for themselves. The basic simple things that they should’ve done and could’ve done were some airdrops of food and water and drop in some military to deliver them. I mean, common sense.

MB: Common sense.

Marble: These guys don’t have common sense. They gotta go check with their lawyers and all this other crap, and, you know, you got people dying – you don’t worry about that other stuff, you go save them. 

MB: And it kind of makes you wonder. How much of it is about common sense and how much of it is lack of care?

Marble: Right. Do we really care? These aren’t our people. Well, that was kind of half the reason he came to my neighborhood. Or probably the only reason. Because I lived in a pretty prominent part of Gulfport, which was a block off the beach in a neighborhood mostly of doctors and lawyers and such.

MB: When you told our Vice President to go f**k himself, could you tell if he made eye contact with you?

Marble: Oh, absolutely he did make eye contact with me. He was about twelve feet or so away at the time. And right as I said it, it was like one of those moments in time where everything stood still and you could just hear this total silence. He looked right up at me and had this grin on his face like, “Oh, you got me.” Like he knew. He thought it was funny. He had this little grin on his face. He looked me right in the eye and kind of rolled his eyes, and then he went on. And right at that moment I was like, I better say it again because I’m not sure they heard me. So I did, but I started walking away because they were running at me like they were about to tackle me. And I was like, “Go fuck yourself, you asshole” as I walked away. That’s why it kind of faded out.

MB: The matter-of-fact quality of how you said it was also pretty hilarious.

Marble: You know, there was something else that was funny about it, too. I had this old ratty Mr. T “I Pity the Fool” T-shirt I was wearing. I think that was a large part of why they let me in. [Laughs.] I was just wearing it because I knew I was going to be getting dirty and nasty with the house.

MB: Because if you had an “Impeach Bush” T-shirt, they never would’ve let you in.

Marble: Oh yeah. They never would’ve let me in.

MB: [Laughing.] But a Mr. T “I Pity the Fool” T-shirt. That gets you in.

Marble: Exactly. [Laughs.]

MB: That pretty much seems up the administration, doesn’t it?

Marble: Exactly. So I’m walking off. I wave at the guy who patted me down. I said to him, “Have a nice day,” and he was looking at me like he wanted to shoot me. I walked back to my house. And, you know, people ask me how I feel about it. Do I regret it? I say the same thing Dick Cheney said. It felt great.

MB: The same thing he said about saying it to Senator Leahy.

Marble: Yeah. I knew he needed to hear that. The country needed to hear that. It felt good, you know? That’s all I can say. It was a great feeling. One of the funniest things I’ve ever done in my life. So I, uh, walked back to the house. I called Jay. This is funny too. I went back to the house. He’s still filming down there. So his cell phone goes off and he interrupted it twice. And tell him to get back to the house before they saw him and took that camera away from him. So as soon as he gets back, the first thing I did was get that DVD and hid it in the bushes. Because I knew they were gonna come back. I just had that feeling.

MB: And they were going to go after that?

Marble: Oh yeah. So I put a blank one in its place. And, sure enough, ten minutes later two guys with machine guns pointed at us come jogging up.

MB: Were these military or Secret Service?

Marble: It was military. In a military uniform, fatigues. They said, “Excuse me, sir, you fit the description of a man that just cussed out the Vice President, wearing an orange shirt…”

MB: So, in effect, the military, with everything that’s going on, all the people in need of help, took time away from the job they were sent down there to do by this administration in order to find you.

Marble: Sure. Yup. So I said, “Well, I’m probably the guy you’re looking for.” And they said, “OK, sir, we’re going to have to handcuff you, we’re going to detain you for questioning. You are not under arrest. Do not run. And they emphasized the do not run part. [Laughs.] I was like, I just told you it was me. I’m not going to run – y’all have the machine guns.

MB: How did they justify those two things? We’re going to handcuff you, but you’re not under arrest?

Marble: I didn’t have the right to inquire about that.

MB: [Laughs.] Yes, you probably wanted to avoid getting shot.

Marble: There was a lot of stress going on at the time. And people, especially military or police in that type of situation, they get an itchy trigger finger. They were looking for an excuse. I just had police pull their guns on me a few days before that.

MB: Because you were out past the curfew.

Marble: Yeah, sure. So they handcuffed me. They put the one on the right extremely tight. I said, “Look, it’s really tight, you know – you don’t have to do that.” They ignored this. So I told Jay to turn the camera back on. He takes the camera with that new blank DVD in it and starts videoing again. They walk me from the house to the train tracks they wouldn’t let me cross beforehand, where a police car was parked. They put me in the backseat and began interrogating me. “Why did you do that, sir? Are you trying to hurt the Vice President?” Blah, blah, blah. I was like, “No, I don’t mean him any physical harm. But, you know, if he can say that on the floor of the senate, where people are supposed to be civil and courteous, then I think I can say it in the middle of the worst disaster in the history of our nation.” They had no idea what I was talking about, so I had to give them a history lesson. Most of them were pretty pissed off. There were a couple who thought it was funny, but most were pretty angry and wanted to take me to jail. 

MB: And these were all soldiers?

Marble: Well, at that point, there were maybe three or four soldiers in military uniforms, and a couple guys were Secret Service. They had the glasses, the little earpieces.

MB: But the guys who were first on the scene were military. Then the Secret Service came after?

Marble: Correct. And some type of uniform police officers. I don’t know if they were from the sheriff’s office. I don’t know who they were.

MB: But the people who asked you, “Did you intend to do any harm to the Vice President?” That was Secret Service?

Marble: That was Secret Service. So I explained all that to them. That was about it. Then, suddenly, they take Jay’s camera away from him. One of them got in the front seat with it and I could see him messing with it. All I know is that video Jay shot of me in handcuffs does not work. They finally said, “Well, apparently you didn’t break any laws. We have your social security number, your phone number, your place of employment.” Blah, blah, blah. Then they said, “If we need to get in touch with you, we will. Don’t get in touch with us.”

MB: Nice little intimidation factor at the end there.

Marble: Yeah, sure, sure. I actually got a call from an attorney a couple weeks ago about this. I’ve had a few people contact me. I’ve never thought about it seriously, but the attorney I talked to apparently seems to think they broke the law with what they did. So I’m kind of weighing my options there with that. Not for any kind of monetary reason, but to further expose their abuse of power. So if he’s willing to make a case out of it, I might be willing to do that. We’ll see.

MB: You’re just looking into that now?

Marble: I had never taken it too seriously, but the more I think about it, things just keep getting worse in this country. This upcoming election in November is going to be a huge election and the reason why is we have a, uh, American citizens have a chance to restore some sort of balance of power. Because we’re basically living under a de facto dictatorship. They control the executive branch, the legislative branch and the judicial branch, and it looks like Bush may get a third Supreme Court appointment. Because Kennedy’s talking about maybe going – how scary is that?

MB: Extremely.

Marble: If they maintain control of Congress, we will have a war with Iran. This is what I believe.

MB: I think you might be right.

Marble: And a war with Iran is essentially a war with Russia and China. Not a war that we want. Russia and China have already said don’t do it. That’s their number one supplier of oil, that’s their energy source. We can’t take away Russia’s and China’s energy source and expect them to sit idly by while we do it. China has the largest military on the planet. Plus they have the most people on the planet. They’re also basically our banker. If they call in their loans, we’re really in trouble. The bottom line is, you’re odds of dying in a war with Iran, Russia and China are a lot greater than dying from a random terrorist act. So are you voting to go to war with Iran, Russia and China or are you voting not to go to war with them? That’s how I see this election. I think this is one of the most important issues I’m trying to push with The Mission NOT Accomplished Tour. People need to vote for candidates that stand up and say they will impeach George Bush, or Dubya Gump, as I call him.

MB: Actually, that’s a good segue. The Mission NOT Accomplished Tour. What is it? What do you hope to accomplish with it? What’s the itinerary? I know you started in front of the White House on Friday.

Marble: Well, I’ll tell you what led up to this whole event being planned. Rockey Vaccarella taking a FEMA trailer, a fake FEMA trailer to Washington, D.C. to say that Bush needed another term in office…

MB: …to get the job done.

Marble: When I saw that on TV, I nearly shit my pants.

MB: Can I quote you on that?

Marble: [Laughing.] Sure…please do. This guy, you know, I kind of feel sorry for this guy.

MB: I kind of feel sorry for him, too. I was going to ask you a question related to that.

Marble: I feel like I owe him an apology. And if you’re listening Mr. Vaccarella, or if you read this, I’m sorry, sir.

MB: Well, I mean, my feeling about it is, on the one hand, the guy suffered greatly from Katrina – he lost his eldest son. But, at the same time, I was going to ask you what you think is going through his mind? To have suffered that, but still come out to support the president on his handling of both preparing for Katrina and the aftermath. To come out in defense of him…

Marble: Well, I think that’s just an example of a Bush sheep. They would jump off a cliff with him. I don’t mean that in a mean way, but these people will support him to the end. No matter what. They would…these are like people who would die in the bunker with Hitler, you know? Some people believe Bush can do no wrong. And the fact of the matter is, Rockey was there and he knows what happened. Now, granted the response was a failure on all levels of government – the city, state and federal – but how could he go to Washington and say he’s trying to raise awareness about that area so people won’t forget - which is certainly an admirable thing - and call for another term for the guy who let us down? The guy who dropped the ball, the guy who started a war based on lies, in the wrong country, wrong place, wrong time. The man who let people die in the streets for day after day after day. The man who wants to start another war with Iran. The man who’s taken the largest surplus in the history of our nation and turned it into the largest deficit in just a short three years. I mean this guy is so incompetent, and how anyone could say he deserves another term in office - I was like, are you insane? I don’t claim to grasp why those people think that way. Though I do think it has a lot to do with growing up in the South and being raised in the church and stuff like that. Being brought up to believe you’re supposed to support your President no matter what.

MB: Especially during a time of war.

Marble: Right, cannot criticize the president during a time of  war, which is total BS. If you want to win a war, you can’t expect someone to fix the problem when he won’t even admit he’s the cause of the problem. How is he going to get us out of it when he won’t even admit he got us into it? It’s ridiculous. So, anyway, that’s what inspired the trip. I actually went on MSNBC’s Hardball show and debated Mr. Vaccerella. With regards to The Mission NOT Accomplished idea, I wanted to be the anti-Rockey. Because the majority of people down in the post-Katrina area do not support this president. I know that for a fact. The overwhelming majority and I’m talking probably at least 80 to 90% of the people. So the first stop was at the White House. I did a speech to the president, asking him to realize the single best thing he could ever hope to do for our country is to go ahead and resign.

MB: And you made this speech just outside the White House.

Marble: Right in front of the White House. And I didn’t get too loud and boisterous. I kept it calm and civil. We are filming this whole trip. The first thing we shot was that. That’s how we kicked it off. And we interviewed a few people. I called on Bush to think about resigning. If he refuses to resign, then I think the only issue that has to be pushed by the opposition in the November election, if people pushed this single issue: “I will impeach Dubya Gump if you elect me. Then we can take back control of Congress and we could get rid of the guy.” I honestly believe that one issue is the only issue that anybody needs to promote for November.

MB: And there are a growing number of candidates nationally who are running on that.

Marble: Well –

MB: Not a lot, but some.

MB: Well, a lot of Democrats seem afraid to actually voice it.

MB: Absolutely.

Marble: They want to stick their finger in there and take a poll.

MB: Sure.

Marble: And that’s following. Being a leader means you got to lead. You take a stand. Set the initiative. You don’t follow polls. Polls are good for some things, not when it comes to this issue.

MB: I think the people who are running on that platform would be considered on the fringe by the Democratic leadership.

Marble: And that’s where I think they’re wrong.

MB: Yeah, they are wrong. But look at Paul Hackett. There’s no reason why Paul Hackett is not a star candidate in the Democratic Party. But the problem seems to be the Democratic leadership at the top.

Marble: Nancy Pelosi specifically said that if we win the majority we will not impeach George Bush. I think she should resign for saying that. I mean because that’s a lie. If they win, everybody knows they’re going to impeach him. So if they’re gonna do it, and we all know they are, then be honest about it.

MB: Sure. Paul Hackett made the Democratic leadership too nervous. He spoke the unvarnished truth.

Marble: And that’s what’s going to happen. They feel like if they can’t control, then they have to silence you.

MB: Right.

Marble: So the main goals of the Mission NOT Accomplished Tour are, one, to encourage people to vote for impeachment and the other goal is to continue to raise awareness of the ongoing problems in the Gulf Coast post-Katrina. There are a couple of big ones. There’s a huge healthcare crisis right now. Very huge. Trauma surgeon shortage. Somebody gets in a car wreck, gets shot, stabbed, they may bypass three or four hospitals before they get to a surgeon. And there’s that golden hour to get care initiated. People have died because of this. I know two people specifically who died directly because of this. I mean there are so many cases I could tell you about. The suicides rates are through the roof. Psychiatric illness rates are through the roof. Murder rates have tripled. Meanwhile, doctors are leaving in droves, nurses are leaving in droves, and no one’s coming in to replace them. So there’s a huge healthcare crisis going on right now.

MB: It’s kind of ironic that the guy who came up to support Bush’s actions regarding Katrina is from New Orleans and the guy who’s speaking out against his actions is from Mississippi. Because Mississippi received much more support, right?

Marble: True. Absolutely. Mississippi has gotten way more support. The recovery in Mississippi has been very different because we have a Washington fat cat lobbyist as our governor. Haley Barber. And what better time to have the fat cat lobbyist as your governor? If he couldn’t get things done, who could? The recovery in Mississippi has been going very well as far as clean up and starting to rebuild. Now there are still all of those things I mentioned that aren’t happening. But in the New Orleans area, they haven’t started doing anything. They haven’t started tearing the buildings down. You can’t rebuild until you get the rubble out of the way. They haven’t even started to get the rubble out of the way. I think they’re not capitalizing on a golden opportunity. New Orleans should be the new capital for making horror movies because there’s block after block after empty building that would be great sets for some horror movies. 

MB: All of which George Bush drove right by during his little anniversary tour there. If you were to parse articles covering his Katrina anniversary photo-ops, some papers had a line or two about this buried in their stories.

Marble: I guess part of the reason they haven’t even started tearing most of the buildings down is, by all people’s estimations, there are still many uncovered bodies in those buildings. They’ll mark a building as clear, but do they really search it? For example, in the movie with Spike [When the Levees Broke], they showed where they’d marked a building as clear and all the doors were locked. Nobody had been inside it. How do you mark a building as clear when nobody ever entered it? And so they’re going to find more bodies. They’re still finding bodies. But, at some point in time, those building are uninhabitable. They’re unusable. Might as well go and start tearing them down. The problem is, nobody wants to do that because the insurance scandal. The insurance industry’s got a multi-billion-dollar scam going on right now. They’re just ripping people off left and right, not wanting to pay claims. People don’t want to rebuild because the levee’s not restored. If a tropical storm, a little teeny tiny tropical storm, came and hit New Orleans, it would be under eight-to-ten feet of water again. They would be back where they started. So why rebuild when the levee’s not strong enough to even stop that? So that’s the big dilemma and I don’t have any good answer for it.

The other thing, there’s a huge shortage of low-income housing. All these people in FEMA trailers, after eighteen months, they’re gonna get evicted. And there’s no housing for them to get to, and the pricing on the houses and apartments that were there before, that survived, have doubled or tripled. The three specific public housing projects they have, you know, they’re selling to private companies who are going to bulldoze them and probably build condos or something.

MB: Sure. Well, there’s a great deal of a kind of Manifest Destiny going on there. I still believe the Bush administration’s inaction before, during and after the storm have something to do with that.

Marble: Oh yeah. They’re making sure they build those casinos real quick, though.

MB: Right.

Marble: And anything big money, you know, but they’re not concerned about the average Joe. So there’s a huge shortage of housing. A huge healthcare crisis. You never hear anything in the news about the healthcare crisis. And that’s coast wide, that’s Louisiana and Mississippi. The third issue, which is a big issue, is they won’t fund a category five levee in New Orleans. If you’re gonna rebuild it, it’s inevitable, sooner or later, maybe a hundred years from now, but a category five storm will hit New Orleans. I mean everyone knew for decades that New Orleans was going to flood if a major storm ever hit.

MB: Except Bush. He just couldn’t predict the breach of the levees.

Marble: Yeah, no one ever predicted the breach of the levees. What a great statement. You’re doing one heckuva job, Brownie. So we’re gonna fire you in a few days. So those are the things I’ve been talking about – the Katrina stuff, the stuff about impeaching him, those are the issues I’ve been trying to raise. I did the thing at the White House yesterday, then we went to Camp Democracy in DC. Then to Philadelphia before coming to New York City. We’ll be at the United Nations.

MB: Let me take you back to the Hardball appearance.

Marble: Sure.

MB: Unfortunately Mr. Vaccarella ate up most of the airtime. You were cut off at the end of the segment. To paraphrase Pink Floyd, your lips moved but nobody heard what you said. What were you trying to say at the end there? Because you were still speaking, but they cut your mike off.

Marble: I was actually trying to mention The Mission NOT Accomplished Tour.

MB: Oh, OK.

Marble: I was going to tell Chris I was thinking about doing my own tour, my own trip to the White House. I didn’t realize I’d been cut off. I had a hard time hearing them because I was down in Mississippi at the time. And he was, you know, in Washington or New York or wherever.

MB: Yet some media outlets automatically jumped on that saying you were ranting and raving at the end there and they cut you off because of it.

Marble: [Laughs.] No, I couldn’t hear what was going on. They just ran out of time.

MB: During the segment, you said to Rockey that President Bush met with you but he wouldn’t meet with Cindy Sheehan, and you asked him why he thought that was? In response, Rockey said Bush had met with Cindy Sheehan twice. First, that’s incorrect. He met with her only once and that was with a group of other parents right after her son Casey had been killed in Iraq, when she was still in shock, in an acute stage of grieving.

Marble: Exactly.

MB: But he never met with her again. And that’s the point. When she was well enough to have an actual conversation with the president, when she was no longer in a vulnerable position, he refused. Yet, not only did Chris Matthews let Rockey go on and on, chewing up the overwhelming majority of airtime, even speaking over you when you attempted to stop Rockey from monopolizing the segment, but Matthews also failed to correct him on that point.

Marble: I think everybody knew my point.

MB: But he didn’t even correct –

Marble: Chris didn’t call him on it.

MB: And that’s the kind of sloppiness I often call out on this site.

Marble: Well, I wouldn’t want to be a Chris Matthews or Keith Olbermann, or in any of their shoes, where I’d have to pretend I’m unbiased. Because all human beings are biased.

MB: But I think, in a way, it’s more…it’s that, at this point in time, it’s more about being truthful. I mean Keith Olbermann has been getting a lot of buzz lately because he’s been truthful. If members of the Bush administration lie, he says they’re lying and points out what they’re lying about. If they shamelessly exploit 9/11, he calls them on it. He’s kept a running timeline he shares with his audience that tracks the overly coincidental, beneficial timing of this administration’s terrorist warnings. I don’t think that’s about being biased or unbiased. I think, journalistically speaking, it’s just doing your job.   

Marble: Oh, I love the guy. He’s great.

MB: I mean that statement he gave recently on Rumsfeld and the administration was brilliant. And he’s made a couple since then.

Marble: That speech was awesome. But he’ll probably get canned.

MB: And the only reason why he might not get canned is his ratings have been growing steadily.

Marble: And that’s, you know –

MB: That’s the only reason why he won’t get fired.

Marble: So you have to dance like a monkey to tell the truth.

MB: You do. And to that point, I think he has been able to do what he does on his show because he really only addresses serious issues for a portion of it. The rest of the time he’s doing an entertainment report, or he’s doing a report on Petey the Three-Eyed Goat.

Marble: [Laughing.] Yeah.

MB: And Zeppo the Juggling Cat. But I understand. Edward R. Murrow was forced to do the same thing. It’s the only way it seems they would allow him to do the other stuff. The serious stuff. And, you know, Fox has taken a huge slide.

Marble: Oh yeah. People are waking up.

MB: And that’s the only thing, at least for the moment, saving Keith Olbermann’s job.

Marble: But my concern is that people are going to wake up too late. To some degree, they already did wake up too late, ’cause we had the 2004 election and Bush is still in office.

MB: Certainly. OK, I know your Cheney quote was printed in scores of national magazines and obviously the video of your encounter with him was ubiquitous. But have you had much airtime on cable and network news? And what’s your feeling on how you’ve been handled by the mainstream media since you’ve come on the scene?

Marble: Well, other than MSNBC, they’ve wanted to avoid it I guess. You know?

MB: Yeah, in doing research for this interview, I couldn’t find another appearance.

Marble: Kinda sweep it under the rug.

MB: You think they’re frightened to have you on?

Marble: Possibly. You know, if they wanted to tape ahead of time if they’re scared I’m gonna say something, I mean they could always do that. So I don’t know. That’s a good question.

MB: I mean you haven’t been on the Today show.

Marble: No.

MB: You haven’t been on the CBS Early Show.

Marble: No.

MB: Or Good Morning America.

Marble: No.

MB: Yet they’ll gladly bring on Ann Coulter or Bill O’Reilly.

Marble: Oh, absolutely. I told the guys at MSNBC I would love to be on a show against Ann Coulter. That would be great. If they want some good ratings, put me on that show. It will be funny, and they’ll have good ratings. And I’ll rip ’em a new one. Seriously. I would love to get on a show with Anne Coulter.

MB: You and me both. But what do you think it says about the mainstream media? That they would have someone on…in fact, right around the time you had your Rockey segment, Matthews had Coulter on Hardball to plug her book. And he praised her throughout interview. It was held outdoors, where they gathered a pre-selected crowd of Coulter fans who were cheering for her. It was nauseating. Matthews literally called her “a great writer.” His exact words. Never mind she’s also a confirmed plagiarist.

Marble: Well, I think there’s a lot of mainstream media whores. Seriously, the guys who were at that press conference with Cheney. One. One reporter spoke up and said something. None of them noted I was quoting Cheney’s own words back to him. Now what does that say about those reporters. Not one of them said, “Hey, Mr. Cheney, didn’t you say that same thing to Senator Leahy?”

MB: Exactly.

Marble: None of them. They had zero balls. And the reason why is they know they won’t have access if they actually say something and speak up. You know the guy who said, “You gettin’ a lot of that?” He probably hasn’t had a single interview since. I don’t know for a fact, but that would be my guess. If you speak up and ask a relevant question, they’re not gonna talk to you anymore. The media is a joke. And that’s why people have to go online. I probably get my information from as many sources as possible. I’m an Internet geek, a computer geek, so I visit numerous websites, international sites, et cetera. But I’ll also watch MSNBC, CNN, Fox. I love watching Fox – it’s really entertaining. I mean they claim to be fair and balanced. Well, why is a Fox correspondent now the White House press secretary? That’s absurd. How is it that Secret Service admitted that they were pretending to be Fox reporters, and it’s OK. That’s fair and balanced.

MB: But most people - and this informs my focus for MediaBloodhound – since most people realize Fox is basically just a mouthpiece for this government, I don’t go after them because I feel it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. Instead, I focus on those mainstream news outlets that are supposed to be doing their jobs, the ones people expect to do their jobs. The CNNs, the New York Times, the MSNBCs…

Marble: Yeah. Why did CNN give Rockey all that airtime? And they hyped up the story: Rockey goes to Washington. Like he’s Rocky Balboa. That was half the reason why I stopped by Philadelphia and ran up and down the stairs and held my arms up at the top.

MB: Did you see the Ed Henry segment? It was a particularly egregious segment on CNN that day.

Marble: No.

MB: He started it off by saying you couldn’t ask for a better script, how it was right out of the movies. Well, yeah. Exactly. You couldn’t ask for a better script. And the White House couldn’t ask for better marketing.

Marble: Sure.

MB: That goes to the point too - I’m sure it goes way back but it’s seems to have become much worse during Bush’s tenure – and that’s reporters in the mainstream media who are doing less journalism and more stenography. For example, with the anniversaries of Katrina and 9/11, the mainstream media reports on all of Bush’s speeches and the political strategy driving them, yet not his disastrous handling of, say, Katrina, the war in Iraq, Afghanistan, the twisted intelligence that got us into this war of choice in Iraq, and his failure to capture Osama bin Laden.

Marble: This week is Katrina. Next week, forget Katrina. It’s 9/11.

MB: And that already started.

Marble: I got that directly from a media persona I talked to. I said, “You know I’m gonna be doing this Mission NOT Accomplished Tour.” And they’re like, “Well, we’re doing 9/11 stories that week.” So I said, “OK, well, maybe I should just show up with a sign that day that says never forget Katrina.” I think what happened on 9/11 was a terrible thing, just like everybody else does. But, basically, the administration is going to use this as a tool to get the focus off of Katrina, off of their failures, off of not catching Osama, and back on the fear mongering, the war on terror.

MB: Right. Which Gore Vidal aptly likens to the war on dandruff.

Marble: [Laughing] Sure. You can’t win a war on terror. I made this point to a man outside the White House who was arguing for Bush. Besides, they’re talking about fighting the war on terror and securing the homeland - secure our borders, secure our ports. I think most people want practical solutions. Practical solutions with the least amount of misery or death inflicted on people. You know, nobody wants to be at war. Nobody wants to be killing other people.

MB: Well…

Marble: Yeah, you got your warmongers.

MB: Yeah. But the average person, yes, I agree.

Marble: And your war profiteers.

MB: And they have profited greatly.

Marble: Now, you know, I guess you have to fight it. But you shouldn’t be destroying our way of life in the process, destroying our credibility around the globe, making the whole world hate us because you’re so obsessed with fighting the war on terror.

MB: And, of course, what they purport to be fighting this war for is the very thing they’re denying their own people.

Marble: Yeah, we’re fighting for freedom and liberty. Well, here’s a little irony - one of the first things they did after 9/11 was close the Statue of Liberty. Liberty has been shut down.

MB: Would’ve made a good headline. It’s a perfect metaphor for what’s happened since then.

Marble: It’s absurd, and it’s sad.

MB: So, speaking of fear mongering, if Cheney were here right now, sitting at this table, what would you say to him?

Marble: I would tell him he should be ashamed of himself. Seriously. He should be ashamed. It seems like, for some reason, power and money are the only things that matter to him. Instead of compassionate conservatism. What a crock of BS. Uh, what about doing what’s right for people, trying to help people. It seems like a totally selfish mentality…you know, I’m in charge and I’m gonna do what I want, make myself a lot of money and screw the rest of you. I think he should be ashamed of himself and I don’t know how else to put that. You know, I don’t wish the guy any harm or anything, but he’s probably been the most powerful vice president in the history of our country.

MB: Absolutely.

Marble: He’s the real president. Everybody knows that.

MB: Sure.

Marble: He, you know, he doesn’t have the best heart. He’s got bad heart disease, so if he believes in some sort of higher power and he really claims to be a Christian, which I’ve never actually seen him do, which is kind of ironic…

MB: It’s more Bush’s domain.

Marble: Yeah. Then, you know, he may seriously want to get his things in order before his next big heart attack happens because, uh…

MB: He’s had, what, 86 heart attacks already?

Marble: Yeah, if there’s really a hell, you know…

MB: [Laughing.] Yeah…

Marble: [Laughing.] It’s gonna be pretty hot for him.

MB: A reservation waiting for him in the front row.

Marble: He’s certainly got hell to pay. A lot of making up to do.

MB: Tell me a little about your how you were brought up, what informed your political views today, because you actually live in a very conservative area.

Marble: Well, I was born in Gulfport, Mississippi. I’ve lived in every county on the Coast. From Pensacola, Florida to Slidell, Louisiana. Lived down there my whole life. Grew up in the church. We went to church every Sunday morning, Sunday night, Wednesday night, and any other night they wanted to have a prayer meeting. My parents were holy rollers. I couldn’t listen to rock and roll. It was the devil’s music. You know, so when I see these politicians spouting their pseudo-Christian point of view…or someone like Ann Coulter. What’s her book? Godless? She claims she’s a Christian? Get real. C’mon.

MB: What about George Bush claiming he’s a Christian?

Marble: That whole war for peace concept, if you read the Bible, the scary thing about that is that’s what the Anti-Christ says.

MB: Which reminds me of something else Gore Vidal’s been pointing out for years now, this idea of perpetual war for perpetual peace. 

Marble: In the Revelations, it says the Anti-Christ will call for war for peace. I’m not saying…[Laughter.]

MB: [Laughing.] That Bush is the Anti-Christ.

Marble: I’m not a practicing Christian now, but I did read the Bible probably about ten times before I was ten years old. I had to memorize it and recite it. So, yeah.

MB: So can I get you on record as saying Bush is the Anti-Christ?

Marble: [Laughter.]

MB: Can I quote you on that?

Marble: [Laughing.] Yeah. But, apparently, he thinks he is.

MB: [Laughing.] But he’s an incompetent Anti-Christ. A bush-league Anti-Christ.

Marble: The diehard Bush supporters are looking forward to Armageddon because then they get to go to heaven. It’s just like the jihadis with the seventy virgins.

MB: Right. Different side of the same coin.

Marble: Yes.

MB: So I know you’ve had a lot of overwhelming support. But you’re a father, you’re a husband. You’re a doctor that works full-time?

Marble: Full-time ER doctor.

MB: Full-time ER doctor. You’re the lead singer in a band?

Marble: Uh, lead guitar and vocals.

MB: In a rock band?

Marble: Yes, an indie rock band

MB: And so, when this all hit, when you were suddenly thrust into the spotlight, how did you handle it? Which happened, of course, right in the middle of dealing with how the hurricane affected your own life.

Marble: Um, I don’t know, it’s kind of strange when you go…I go to places now and people just come up and say, “Hey, you’re the guy that was in that Spike Lee movie.” And the majority of them are like that man who walked up to me the other day in front of the White House. He shook my hand and said, “I really appreciate what you did.” I got probably 5,000 emails in the month or so after that. Ninety-five percent of them were supportive, and then were 5%, you know, “If I ever see you, I’m gonna beat you up.” You know, stuff like that.

It’s been kind of crazy. Mainly, you just have to stay busy. Stay busy and work a lot. ’Cause, uh, it’s almost…you tend to get overly emotional about things. And I do, so I’m aware of it. But when you see what other people have been dealt, what they’ve gone through. I mean I could tell you some horror stories. Last shift I worked. This is a crazy story, but it happens almost every day now. This psychiatric stuff, people going crazy. I had a man…police had a man who had knife in his hand for whatever reason. They were called to the scene. They started chasing him. He ran away, and as he’s running away he starts stabbing himself. He stabbed himself in his neck, in his chest, he stabbed himself in his leg three times, he cut both of his wrists, he stabbed his hands. And then he proceeded to run head-on into oncoming traffic and got hit by a car doing about fifty.

MB: God.

Marble: You know, stuff like that did not happen before Katrina. Well, every once in a while stuff like that would happen, but it’s just…the stress, the stress level is so high that people snap. A lot of people snapping and doing things they wouldn’t normally do. A lot of craziness. It’s kind of like, uh, the Wild West. And that’s more so in New Orleans, but even so on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. There’s a lot of lawlessness going on.

MB: Still going on.

Marble: People doing what they want, when they want. And, uh, doing bad things to other people. I had one guy who got shot in the head because he wouldn’t give another guy a piece of chicken.

MB: Which, granted, could happen at any time.

Marble: At any time, but these things didn’t happen at nearly the frequency. Three, four times as much.

MB: And because you work in an ER, you’re witnessing the increase in these types of incidents firsthand.

Marble: I see it on a daily basis at work. All kinds of horror stories. I’m actually thinking of writing about them as more of a therapeutic thing for myself. Get the stories out. Because the things I’ve heard people tell me, it’s just amazing some of the stuff that’s going on. People living in, you know, houses in one room with five-to-eight kids. No running water. No electricity. Things that shouldn’t be happening. And they are happening, but nobody knows about ’em so nothing gets done. Now, I’ve got sisters working for international relief and development. My sister-in-law works for them. My wife’s best friend works for another relief agency. I have a lot of friends working with different relief organizations. My wife’s been going to shoot video. You know, there’s a lot of people trying to help out and do what they can, but there’s just so much need right now going on that, you know…that’s all you can do, is do what you can do…

MB: So coming back to the original question, there are so many people in great need of help that this being thrust on you is nothing. That compared to what these people are going through, you’re thinking, “I’m lucky.”

Marble: Oh yeah. Absolutely, absolutely. Like this trip. I’m trying to get across a message that I believe in and get word out to a bunch of people of how much help is still needed. But, at the same time, getting away for a few days is a break for my wife. It’s a break for her. Just to have a little vacation.

MB: Even though you’re spending it getting the word out.

Marble: Yeah.

MB: Ben, thanks so much for your time.

Marble: My pleasure. Thank you.

Dr. Ben Marble can be seen in Spike Lee’s HBO documentary When the Levees Broke. You can find information about his many websites, his band dR. O and other projects at www.benmarblemd.com.

September 20, 2006

Story of the Day:
Bush Allies Say War on Terror Failing

It's interesting what news the mainstream media reports from the U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York this week, and what it doesn't. The focus has been almost solely on Bush versus Iranian President Ahmadinejad, as though we're watching a dress rehearsal for the next war. There's also Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Someone the mainstream media seems overly eager to paint as a madman, refusing to lend credence to any of his words, some of which give an accurate, if not diplomatically nuanced, assessment of Felonious George.

Yet, while these pissing contests and name-calling dramas receive the spotlight, substantive criticisms from Bush's allies draw little or no attention. Take, for instance, these words from Pakistan's President Musharraf:

While we confront terrorism, our strategy must seek to eliminate this phenomenon comprehensively. We cannot do so unless we understand and address the root causes of terrorism today. How are terrorists able to find willing recruits even among educated youth and democratic societies? The reasons are clear. Across the Muslim world, old conflicts and new campaigns of military intervention have spawned a deep sense of desperation and injustice. Each new battleground involving an Islamic state has served as a new breeding ground for extremists and terrorists. Indiscriminate bombings, civilian casualties, torture, human rights abuses, racial slurs and discrimination only add to the challenge of defeating terrorism.

Note to mainstream media: How about more articles revolving around Musharraf's and other allies' constructive criticisms of the war on terror, and fewer stories on how much we should fear Ahmadinejad and Chavez.

Besides, when our own president started an illegal war based on fixed intelligence, runs secret prisons, orders the torture of human beings, curtails free speech, spies on his own citizens and attempts to rewrite laws to retroactively immunize his administration from war crimes, it's a little absurd to act as if he has any moral high ground.

Bush Allies In War On Terror: We Need A New Approach
Think Progress

September 19, 2006

Story of the Day:
Olbermann Hammers Bush on Thought Policing

Editor's Note: Though Keith Olbermann gave his commentary, "Bush Owes Us an Apology," on Monday, I felt compelled to respond to it before it became really old news. My words immediately follow. But do yourself a favor: click on the link to the full transcript of Keith's statement at the end of this post.

Keith Olbermann is fast becoming a true American hero. His commentaries at the close of his show Countdown legend. Let's just hope Keith's ratings continue to rise; I have a feeling it's the only thing keeping him on the air. For we shouldn't fool ourselves that, in the executives' eyes it has much, or anything whatsoever, to do with his searing, brilliant words, the likes of which, it is safe to say at this point, have not graced our televisions on a news program since the days of the man he so obviously emulates in his commentaries: Edward R. Murrow. Who, like Olbermann, was forced by his bosses to also report on the trivial in return for the freedom to bring substantive news analysis to his audience.

The other night, a friend of mine said that he thinks the reason why people on network and cable news fail to do their jobs as journalists is because they make too much money to jeopardize their positions. Of course, this is true on some level and I acknowledged as much. Then I replied, "But look at Olbermann. It doesn't have to be this way." Keith is living proof of that.

Courage. Responsibility to your viewers. Adherence to reality, facts and justice. It's the way it's supposed to be. Mr. Olbermann, in just a couple of months, during which his commentaries have grown in precision, depth and moral authority, has kicked some light into the darkness that is television news. In the coming months, it will be interesting to see whether his bosses, peers and other news executives spread this light, or envelop Mr. Olbermann in that still pervading darkness.

Bush Owes Us an Apology, by Keith Olbermann
Countdown with Keith Olbermann

GET THE HOUND IN YOUR INBOX

  • Don't miss the latest media critique, scoop or satire. (On average, 2-4 posts a week.)

    Enter Your Email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Help Support Truth in Media

  • This is a one-man operation. Your donations, which support timely research and investigations, directly help to keep the media honest. Thanks for whatever you can give.

Search



Read Satire (Trans Fat 0g)

Google Ads

Never Again...Again

Legal

  • All Original Material
    © 2008 MediaBloodhound