« March 2006 | Main | May 2006 »

April 30, 2006

Story of the Day:
Colbert Serves a Mezze Plate of "Truthiness"

Stephen Colbert (remaining in "The Colbert Report" character) skewered George W. Bush and the press corps the other night at the White House Correspondents Dinner. Some jokes definitely went over better than others. Take, for instance, Colbert's following jab at the reporters:

"Let's review the rules. Here's how it works. The president makes decisions, he’s the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Put them through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Make love to your wife. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know--fiction."

How did the room react? Kind of like the swift boat captain in "Apocalypse Now" when, under enemy fire, he suddenly realizes a spear has pierced his chest.

George and Laura's tight faces were unmistakable by the end of Colbert's routine. George shook Colbert's hand summarily while shooting tactical nuclear daggers. Laura refrained from extending hers, giving him a warm look that said, "You're dead to me. No, really. I'm not even kidding. Dead."

Hopefully, Colbert or Jon Stewart will show clips of this brilliant appearance tomorrow. I don't suppose it will get much play in mainstream media venues.

Mr. Colbert, I salute your "truthiness.” You have balls the size of the ozone layer.

Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Correspondents Dinner
By E&P Staff
Editor & Publisher

April 29, 2006

Story of the Day:
Cartoon Comparing Legacies of Carter and GWB

In case you missed it, political cartoonist Ward Sutton breaks down the legacies of Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush. It's Saturday. Laugh a little:

Jimmy Versus George: A Presidential Smackdown!, by Ward Sutton
Sutton Impact

April 28, 2006

Op-Ed Column:
Who Loves Hu, Baby?

Chinese President Hu Jintao and George W. Bush agree on at least one thing: torture. Together, these two champions of inhumanity addressed reporters - though took no questions - at a stately welcoming ceremony on the White House lawn lawn last week.

Intended to be a tightly scripted, ceremonial affair - no pesky questions from reporters, no awkward allusions to human rights abuses - this empty photo-op served two overarching purposes. First, to help our Boy King appear more presidential at a time when even a Fox News poll has his approval rating at 33% (put in perspective, Nixon’s was at 31% during the Senate Watergate hearings, as details of his misdeeds were broadcast nightly into every living room in America). Second, this red carpet treatment overtly showcased Bush administration support for the Chinese leadership, despite its well documented and ongoing anti-democratic rule, which includes, among other institutions, no freedom of the press - any outside news infiltrating China is censored, word for word, by the state (with the help, you’ll be proud to know, of American ISP providers like Yahoo, MSN and Google).

But this orchestrated affront to liberty - during which both leaders shamefully extolled the value of “human rights” while simultaneously, as a result of their directives, untold numbers of innocent human beings continue to be tortured - was shattered when a Chinese woman interrupted President Hu’s address. She cried, "President Bush, stop him from killing! President Bush, stop him from persecuting the Falun Gong!" (It turned out she had obtained a press pass legitimately as reporter for a Falun Gong newspaper.)

Falun Gong, a religious practice in China, was banned by the state in 1999. Since then thousands of its members have gone missing to “labor re-education camps” - likened by many to the concentration camps run by the Nazis - where they are tortured, experimented on by teams of doctors and murdered, and their organs then harvested. The Chinese government declared Falun Gong members enemies of the state - similar to enemy combatants here - so they are accorded no legal representation whatsoever, and no trial. They just…disappear.

Subsequent to the protester’s appeals to stop Mr. Hu's murderous regime, she was dragged from the proceedings by Secret Service, whereupon Hu continued his address as though the woman’s cries were but a passing ill wind. The sour whiff of truth.

The coverage of the same scene in the mainstream media was typified by this account filed by The Associated Press:

“In a surprise outburst that cast a diplomatic shadow, a screaming protester confronted President Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao and interrupted the welcoming ceremony on the White House lawn Thursday. Bush later apologized to the Chinese leader.”

“Surprise outburst,” “cast a diplomatic shadow,” “screaming protester,” “confronted,” “interrupted the welcoming ceremony.” The nerve. The gall. Jolting them with her selfish concern for human life. Throwing cold water on their Orwellian pomp.

The article continues: “‘President Bush, stop him from killing,’ the woman shouted, to the surprise of hundreds of guests spread across the lawn on a sunny, warm day. ‘President Bush, stop him from persecuting the Falun Gong’ - a banned religious movement in China.” What kind of sick, twisted person would disrupt a ceremony on such a “sunny, warm day”? And hey, sister, don’t you know you’re barking up the wrong tree? Asking our Bleeder-in-Chief to stop killing and persecution is like asking a fat man to order a salad in a bakery. Oh, and that in-depth description of Falun Gong, “a banned religious movement in China”- not another word about their suffering or the brutality of Mr. Hu and his government in the rest of the article.

Then, with no tongue in cheek or irony in sight, there’s this: “Outside the White House gates, hundreds of banner-waving protesters loudly demonstrated against Hu's visit. The clamor could be heard faintly during an elaborate lunch Bush gave in Hu's honor.” Injustice is served lavishly by these torturers-in-arms. They dine in gluttonous splendor as muffled protests to their deeds whistle in the background like moral tinnitus.

The AP article goes on to report, “The Web sites of the state-run China Central Television and the official Xinhua news agency made no mention of the protest. Both said that ‘Bush held a solemn ceremony to welcome Hu.’” Isn’t it comforting to know just how close our own mainstream media’s coverage is to that of China’s state-controlled news?

Thank Hu from the bottom of my heart.

April 27, 2006

Story of the Day:
Couric Pulls a Hume

Katie Couric, sounding more like White House shill Brit Hume of Fox News, does her best today to play down Bush's steady slide in the polls. A Today show segment with Tim Russert is set up by a brief report by Kelly O'Donnell, who begins, "Another low. That's a phrase you've heard before, when you consider this poll and others. It's really been a pattern, a slow decline."

Couric then brings on Russert and says, "Let's start with the poll numbers, Tim. This has been -- no doubt about it -- a rough patch for the administration." Uh, come again? How does she get a "rough patch" from O'Donnell's "a pattern, a slow decline"? She continues, "His -- President Bush's approval rating is down just one point. Do you think in a strange way, the White House is breathing a sigh of relief?"

To his credit (and The Barber of Meet the Press is never worthy of much), Tim Russert begins his response with one word: "No." Though I'm sure the White House is breathing a sigh of relief knowing that Couric will be taking her brand of hard-hitting journalism to her new anchor position at CBS.

It's incredible to think that Couric and the man she'll be succeeding, Bob "I Baked These Questions Just for You, Mr. President" Schieffer, make Dan Rather look like Edward R. Murrow.

Good night, and good luck.

Finding the Bright Side in All-Time Low Approval Rate, by Joseph Brown
Media Matters

April 26, 2006

Story of the Day:
NYT's David Sanger Strikes Again

New York Times reporter David Sanger's lead story today is a primer on his consistent softball coverage of George W. Bush.

Starting with the headline, "Bush Takes Steps to Ease Increase in Energy Prices," we know we're in Sanger country. A more forthright headline might read, "Bush Eases Pollution Rules in Effort to Reduce Gas Prices" or "Oil Experts Not Buying Bush's Plan to Reduce Gas Prices." Both of these points are made in this article, the former cradled in the soothing “relaxation of environmental standards." Mmm, don't worry, we're just relaxing them. Of course, if I know my Chomsky, such framing implies something must be "overly rigid," an accepted societal pejorative. (Incidentally, Sanger does not once allude to the environmental impact of this proposal in Bush's plan). And the latter point, oil experts' unhappiness with Bush's proposals? Sanger delays that one line until the article continuation on page A14 (fifteen paragraphs into the story) and blunts the criticism, in effect absolving him, by implying there’s not much Bush can do about it, anyway: “Oil experts, though, said that these steps were small ones, and that Mr. Bush’s ability to affect gasoline prices was limited.”

Such proposed alternative headlines might have underscored the specious, venal and ineffective nature of Bush's proposals. Instead, Sanger furthers the false impression that our Cheer Leader's efforts are constructive. Adding to this impression is the Orwellian photo of Bush delivering this drivel near a surreal backdrop of an environmentally friendly looking oil refinery, with the caption: "President Bush called for the reversal of tax breaks for oil companies engaging in some types of oil exploration." First by not citing the creepy, manipulative backdrop, Sanger becomes complicit in its deceptive intent; second, the reversed tax breaks for oil companies to which the caption refers is a laughable pittance, far outweighed by the money reaped by the very same companies that would benefit from a further easing of pollution standards. As Jim VandeHei and Steven Mufson of the Washington Post report today: "His proposal merely stretches out a tax write-off from oil exploration from two years to five years, a plan that industry officials do not oppose." Moreover, a possible "windfall profits" tax on oil companies suggested by some Republicans - man, are these guys fearing for their jobs or what? - which would actually have an impact on prices, was tabled by Bush until pigs fly out of Cheney's ass. Don't they understand driving Big Oil's record profits is the only tangible success of his administration?

As one oil consultant put it (from the same Washington Post article), Bush's proposals are "more or less like prescribing aspirin to take care of prostate cancer." One might say the same about David E. Sanger's approach to covering George W. Bush.

Bush Takes Steps to Ease Increase in Energy Prices
By David E. Sanger
The New York Times

April 25, 2006

Story of the Day:
Let the Yoga Wars Begin

Today's story, an inane little gem from ABC News, is based on the false presupposition that yoga practice in the U.S. has more to do with embracing Hindu dogma than it does with decreasing stress, keeping limber and firming one's coin slot. Journalist John Berman pits two sectarian camps of yoga adherents against each other, one Christian and one Hindu (or "traditionalist"), neither representative of mainstream yoga. With this ludicrous framing, he makes it sound like the Christian camp's only two choices were to either transgress principles of their faith or start their own form of yoga. Rather than, say, join one of the millions of yoga classes, like most, that push you to treat your body like a temple but your mind as you please.

Berman writes, "The original goal of Yoga was to develop self-awareness and help individuals find divinity within themselves." But he leaves it at that, misleading readers in order to set up a manufactured conflict and agitate religious tensions.

"So she [Christian yoga teacher Susan Bordenkircher] joined a growing trend of modifying traditional yoga by replacing many of the chants with biblical phrases or Christian themes. While breathing in, she speaks of inhaling the holy spirit."

Berman then brings in the "yoga purists," who say it's not yoga without Hinduism. Professor of yoga philosophy Subhas Tiwaris, sounding as if he's reading from a script of the old TV series "Kung Fu," explains, "If you take a tree and chop off its roots, then you don't have a tree, do you? Yoga is mind, body, spirit." (And let's not forget the firm coin slot.)

Berman then sics Bordenkircher on him, who "bristles at this charge and defends her practice":

"There is no way that you can take a posture that is from a body that God created and say this can only be used for the Hindu faith." (Great. A fundamentalist Christian lecturing us on the necessity of multiple interpretations.)

God knows there's not enough religious strife in the world. With the wars on Christmas and Easter passing until next year, it's heartening to see the mainstream media plumbing new depths to ratchet up religious ire. Now, if they can just bring these warring yoga disciples to actual blows. Nothing says yoga like sectarian violence.

And...exhale.

Yoga With a Christian Bent, by John Berman
ABC News

April 24, 2006

Story of the Day:
Bush Defends His Foreign Policy "To the Max"

Resident George, speaking today to a business group in Irvine, CA, proved once again that without the mainstream media's help he would've been toast long ago. Certainly a one-term president. Quite likely a no-term president. Karl Rove created an image of George W. Bush as the guy everyone would love to have a beer with, and the mainstream media ran with this rather than focus on his record and ideas. But history has spoken: Bush was no everyman, just the wrong man. And, as it turns out, not the kind of guy you'd really want to share a beer with, unless that guy happens to be an insecure, mean-spirited, former alcoholic, born-again Christian with a raging Oedipal complex.

With that inimitable mix of condescension, ignorance and insanity, here's our leader on what drives his foreign policy:

"I base a lot of my foreign policy decisions on some things that I think are true. One, I believe there's an Almighty. And, secondly, I believe one of the great gifts of the Almighty is the desire in everybody's soul, regardless of what you look like or where you live, to be free."

On committing troops to battle:

"I also want to let you know that before you commit troops that you must do everything that you can to solve the problem diplomatically. And I can look you in the eye and tell you I feel I tried to solve the problem diplomatically to the max and would have committed troops both in Afghanistan and Iraq, knowing what I know today."

Was there ever a more inappropriate, tone-deaf president? "I tried to solve the problem diplomatically to the max." Fantastic. The leader of the free world is leveraging dorky high school lingo from the early eighties to describe his heartfelt effort to avoid sending American troops into battle.

While everyone now agrees there were no WMD in Iraq, Resident George refuses to succumb to reality:

"Iraq has -- had weapons of mass destruction and has the knowledge as how to produce weapons of mass destruction."

Finally, civil war in Iraq? Don't make him smirk:

"And what you're watching on your TV screens is a new democracy emerging."

Hmm, I can't seem to get that channel. Speaking of channels, I wonder which stations, if any, will mention this magical mystery tour of Irvine today. George W. Bush to the max.

Bush Says He Tried to Avoid War 'To The Max,' Explains How God Shapes His Foreign Policy
By E&P Staff
Editor & Publisher

April 23, 2006

Story of the Day:
Bombing the Media

In case you missed this, political cartoonist Tom Tomorrow focuses on the attempt by the White House to blame the media for negative reporting in Iraq.

Clearly, It Was the Media That Invaded Iraq, by Tom Tomorrow
This Modern World

April 22, 2006

Story of the Day:
Kerry's Best Speech That No One Will Hear

John Kerry may have delivered the best speech of his life today at Boston's Faneuil Hall. Yes, such passion and candor would've been nice to see during his run for president. He squandered many opportunities to tell Americans the unvarnished truth then, and to be fearless and hungry enough in his pursuit to not just beat Bush but to tear off his mask and stomp on it. To shine an unmistakable light on this administration’s nightmarish farce. To not play Rove's game, or into Rove's hands. To pick Georgie Boy apart like a great prizefighter, like Ali, confidently and relentlessly exposing vulnerability after vulnerability, until finally, like his father glancing haplessly at his watch during the debate with Clinton, he just wants it to end. No mas.

Kerry looked like he had some of that juice during the first debate. Bush appeared beaten and bloodied. Unprepared and overmatched. Peevish. Lost. The pathetic leader reading “My Pet Goat” in a classroom after being told his country is under attack. But Kerry couldn’t put him away as the debates, and the campaign, wore on. His plan of attack was too cautious. I think he knew what was at stake. I do. But his years of compromises in the Senate and comfort level in lifestyle – as well as Ed Norton-like direction from campaign advisor Bob Shrum - prevented him from risking what was necessary: to have cared more about the future of his country than that of his political prospects or legacy. To have shown the courage of what, uniquely, made him both a decorated veteran and an outspoken dissenter of the same war in Vietnam. 

That said, when you have a mainstream media that allowed Kerry - running against George "Daddy Pulled Strings And I Still Went AWOL" Bush - to be swift-boated to death, then words and deeds are rendered meaningless.

Even with the sky potentially falling on the Bush White House these days, think of how few, if any, mainstream media outlets will cover John Kerry's speech today. Or will cover it and banish it to the back pages. Or will cover it and downplay its significance. Chalk it up to the campaign season. Politics as usual. A partisan attack. The substance of the speech never addressed. Its message mugged. Silenced. Forgotten.

Say you're one of the ones who read it.

Senator Kerry: Attacks on dissent 'cheap and shameful'
Transcript of Speech
Raw Story

April 21, 2006

Story of the Day:
CIA Agent Fired for Exposing Secret Gulags

The Associated Press reported today that CIA Director Porter Goss has fired veteran CIA agent Mary McCarthy.

It opens: "In a highly unusual move, the CIA has fired an employee for leaking classified information to the news media, including details about secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe that resulted in a Pulitzer Prize-winning story, officials said Friday."

Well, it may be a "highly unusual move," but hardly surprising and unusual in the context of previous reports about ongoing activities within the CIA. From the op-ed column "And Now They're Coming for You" (published here March 5):

Attempting to crack down on leaks, the Bush administration is now amping up the fascism. When it comes to threatening and actively pursuing those who would tell the truth, The Washington Post reports:

"The efforts include several FBI probes, a polygraph investigation inside the CIA and a warning from the Justice Department that reporters could be prosecuted under espionage laws."

CIA Director Porter Goss, the Bush lackey brought in post-9/11 under the guise of improving our national intelligence, "has been conducting numerous interviews and polygraph examinations of employees in an effort to discover whether any of them have had unauthorized contact with journalists."

That was then, and this is now. Back to today's AP story:

"The Post's Dana Priest won a Pulitzer Prize [aided by McCarthy's leaked information] this week for her reporting on a covert prison system set up by the CIA after Sept. 11, 2001, that at various times included sites in eight countries. The story caused an international uproar, and government officials have said it did significant damage to relationships between the U.S. and allied intelligence agencies."

This article's headline should read:

CIA Agent Fired for Disclosing Secret Foreign Gulags

"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss told Congress in February.

Yes, your mission. A mission that would compel you to fire an American law enforcement official for helping to uncover secret prisons. In reality, torture chambers where human beings - untold numbers of them completely innocent - are held indefinitely, without legal recourse, to suffer atrocities, even death, in the name of freedom and democracy.

Mission accomplished.

CIA Fires Employee for Alleged Leak, by Katherine Shrader
The Associated Press

GET THE HOUND IN YOUR INBOX

  • Don't miss the latest media critique, scoop or satire. (On average, 2-4 posts a week.)

    Enter Your Email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Help Support Truth in Media

  • This is a one-man operation. Your donations, which support timely research and investigations, directly help to keep the media honest. Thanks for whatever you can give.

Search



Read Satire (Trans Fat 0g)

Google Ads

Never Again...Again

Legal

  • All Original Material
    © 2008 MediaBloodhound